Hostile Amish
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Welcome
editHi, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for your excellent edits to Marathon-related pages. Are you by any chance Hamish Sinclair? I was a regular reader of the story page for many years. Foobaz·o< 18:27, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi there
I think this topic for an article is perfectly acceptable, worthy, even. However, it doesn't seem quite ready as an article, or even a stub yet because it has no content. I have since moved it to your sandbox: User:Hostile_Amish/List_of_basic_human_anatomy_topics. Perhaps you can move it back when it has some content. Thanks! --Rifleman 82 (talk) 15:13, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Pria River
editThe article is a stub which complies to the guidelines of the Wiki River Project.Afil (talk) 01:20, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- All right, thanks for letting me know. Sinclair (talk) 01:32, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
All articles have references indicated. Afil (talk) 01:41, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm, it doesn't appear that way on your most recent new river topics. But I'll take your word for it. Sinclair (talk) 01:44, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
I first placed a hangon tag, then removed it entirely. If he exists, he is notable. Bearian (talk) 23:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Speedy Delete of Grebyn_Corporation
editI noticed that there was a link from wiki/.com to Grebyn_Corporation (under grebyn.com), so I decided maybe I should create a page (being as it's my company). But I wasn't loquacious enough and before I could even notice anything about it, poof! I don't really care, I suppose. But it was sure surprising.
User talk:Karlnyberg From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search
[edit] Grebyn Corporation
A tag has been placed on Grebyn Corporation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Sinclair (talk) 04:04, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Cleveland Indians
editHi Sinclair. Thank you for your suggestion. It makes perfect sense because it would condense things. At WikiProject Baseball, part of the project is to have a baseball page for every season of every team. For some reason, season pages were done for every team except Cleveland. I was starting the pages and was going to fill them in this week. Cheers Maple Leaf 23:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- I understand. Thanks for telling me. Sinclair talk/"contribs" 00:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Test
editPranhita River
editThis is regarding the Pranhita River Page,on which Speedy delete tag was placed. I think there is enough contents in the article,regarding location of the river,which two rivers it is formed of,which river it is tributery of.I think this article throws light on the details of Geography of India. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rowheat (talk • contribs) 13:12, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi - I've just removed the speedy notice on Ramabanta. Real towns are NEVER EVER speedied - especially if a "lack of context", as you declared, includes an accurate location complete with relevant nearby features with their own articles (i.e., a fairly thorough context). Please be careful when wielding the db templates! Grutness...wha? 23:07, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Subject appears to be notable- see the number of hits on Google Scholar and Google News. I reccomend that you take the article to AfD if you believe it should be deleted. I am now going to add a source to the page and clean it up a tad. J Milburn (talk) 19:26, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- Cleaned it up a little. He seems to pass the professor test- there are certainly a lot of mentions of him online. J Milburn (talk) 19:35, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- I've only just come across him myself when I was going through the CSD lists. I'll have a snoop around for some more information later today. J Milburn (talk) 12:54, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks. Sinclair talk/contribs 17:04, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Motto of the day
editHello, I notice you're using one of the {{motd}} templates, run by Wikipedia:Motto of the day. You may have noticed that some of the mottos recently have been followed by a date from 2006, or on occasion simply "Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia". The reason for this is that Motto of the day is in some very serious need of help. Participation in the project, which has never been especially high, has dropped considerably over this past summer, to the point we have had several days where no motto was scheduled to appear at all. Over the past several weeks, I've been the only editor scheduling mottos at all, but there aren't enough comments on some of these mottos to justify their use. If we do not get some help - and soon - your daily mottos will stop. In order for us to continue updating these templates for you, we need your help.
When you get a chance between your normal editing, could you stop by our nominations page and leave a few comments on some of the mottos there, especially those that do not have any comments yet? This works very simply; you read a motto, decide whether or not you like it, and post your opinion just below the motto. That's it - no experience required, just an idea of what you personally like and what you feel reflects Wikipedia and its community. If you do have past experience with the project, then please close some of the older nominations once they've got a decent consensus going. There are directions on the nominations page on how to do this.
If you have any questions, please let me know, or post on the project's talk page. I'm looking forward to reading your comments on the suggested mottos, and any additional suggestions you'd like to make. Until then, happy editing! Hersfold (t/a/c) 02:31, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Motto of the Day Help Request April 2014
editMotto of the Day (WP:MOTD) is in a state of emergency and really needs your help! There are not enough editors who are reviewing or nominating mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review, and this probably means that you will notice a red link or “This space for rent” as our mottos for the next weeks and months.
Please take a moment to review the nominations and nominate your own new mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review and Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/'Specials. Any help would be appreciated! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- This message has been sent by pjoef on behalf of Motto of the Day to all editors of the English Wikipedia who are showing MOTD's templates on their pages, and to all the participants to MOTD: (page, template, and category).
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)