User talk:Hossen27/Archive 2
Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue III - May 2006
editThe May 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —ERcheck @ 23:57, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Military of Australia and Military history WikiProject
editHi Hossen27. I recently found out about your portal in the Wikipedia:Portal/Proposals discussion. I've been assisting on the Portal:United States Marine Corps (USMC) that was discussed along with your Military of Australia portal. From my work on the USMC portal, I found out about the Military history WikiProject, and have joined the project and the associated "United States military history task force". The WikiProject has a country task forces - including British, Canadian, Chinese, French, Polish ... We are noticably missing an Australian task force. It would be a natural fit for you and others who are associated with your portal.
From my experience, it is a very nice collaborative community. Though individuals may sign on to a particular task force, there is cooperation and collaboration of the larger group. (I've had the pleasure of assisting with British World War I articles.)
I invite you to visit and consider joining us. Here is a current task forces list.
—ERcheck @ 02:55, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
- OK ... I should have checked the list. I see you are a member of the WPMILHIST, so my remarks introducing the project are not needed. However, I don't know whether you are following the discussion on needed/suggested task forces. I really would like to see an Australian task force. Would you be interested in leading it? —ERcheck @ 02:59, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
- Welcome back! Thank you for your response. With your experience on the Portal and your interest in the topic, I personally think you would be a great fit. I'm not sure of what level of commitment it would take, but it would certainly be nice to know that Australia has its own task force. It would probably give you a larger community to draw from for help. For example, I am only a member of the US task force, but when the general request was put forward (on the WikiProject talk page) to convert the British WWI unit infoboxes to the new Military history boxes, I volunteered to help. (mentioned above). I look forward to hearing more from you. —ERcheck (talk) @ 12:03, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- Knee surgery... hope it goes well. As far as the Australian task force, you should coordinate with Kirill Lokshin (talk) (the Military history WikiProject lead coordinator). He'll help get things set up for the task force. Do you have a few people who will work you on the task force? —ERcheck (talk) @ 03:28, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- I would be very interested in joining an Australian military history task force. --Nick Dowling 12:34, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- Knee surgery... hope it goes well. As far as the Australian task force, you should coordinate with Kirill Lokshin (talk) (the Military history WikiProject lead coordinator). He'll help get things set up for the task force. Do you have a few people who will work you on the task force? —ERcheck (talk) @ 03:28, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Welcome back! Thank you for your response. With your experience on the Portal and your interest in the topic, I personally think you would be a great fit. I'm not sure of what level of commitment it would take, but it would certainly be nice to know that Australia has its own task force. It would probably give you a larger community to draw from for help. For example, I am only a member of the US task force, but when the general request was put forward (on the WikiProject talk page) to convert the British WWI unit infoboxes to the new Military history boxes, I volunteered to help. (mentioned above). I look forward to hearing more from you. —ERcheck (talk) @ 12:03, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
This is great ... I'm very much looking forward to the establishment of the Australian task force. From time to time, I find myself running across articles Australian military articles — it will be great to have someone looking after them. —ERcheck (talk) @ 13:21, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- Ouch! I hope the pain goes away quickly and your recovery is uneventful. You and Nick Dowling should make a great team to start the task force — both being valuable contributors to the area already. Though I have very little knowledge in the area, if there is something that you need help with, feel free to ask me. I'll do my best. —ERcheck (talk) @ 13:34, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Excellent! I've gone ahead and created the task force page for you here; all of the background red-tape stuff is either done or will be done momentarily. The most obvious thing do start with, in my opinion, would be to tag at least some of the more prominent articles in the area (as described on that page); hopefully that'll get some other people to join up. If you have any other questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to ask me. Thanks! Kirill Lokshin 16:03, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Military history assessment department
edit- Also could you tell me if anybody can help in the assessment department of the Military history WikiProject or is it a bit of a select group.
Yes, anyone can assess. (I double checked on this to be sure.) The Assessment Department page give information about assessments, as well as guidance on the different designations. (The designations are case-sensitive, i.e., Stub, not stub; and Start, not start.) —ERcheck (talk) @ 13:46, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
RAAF squadron template
editThanks for developing a template to ease navigation between the RAAF's flying squadrons. It looks great and works well IMO. --Nick Dowling 12:37, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Australian task force - congratulations
editCongratulations on getting the task force off the ground. You already have a number of participants signed up in addition to you and Nick. (Hope you're feeling better.) —ERcheck (talk) @ 15:07, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- Great work! 354 pages (and counting) under the Australian task force. (I've added a few in my spare time.) Hope recovery is progressing well. —ERcheck (talk) @ 02:32, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- I'm a little confused at the situation - my understanding (based on the page) is that the task force is dedicated to Australian military history. Project ADF still exists at this point (there was no vote regarding a merge) so do I understand correctly that Project ADF will be looking after current military information, and the task force which will be historical information? Obviously there will be some overlap in terms of shared articles, but there shouldn't be any overlap on content. As anybody has probably noticed I've only made contributions to current information, so under current arrangements I probably won't have much to do with the task force, though happy to help where I can. Justinbrett 18:01, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue IV - June 2006
editThe June 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Kirill Lokshin 05:51, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
british and american english
editPlease do not change spelling from british english to american english or viceversa, as you did to webcolors. Thank you. ILovePlankton 18:04, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue V - July 2006
editThe July 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot.
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history Coordinator Elections!
editThe Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by August 11!
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot - 18:41, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:Cecil Foott.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:Cecil Foott.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:05, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Tamworth Pic - Thanks!
editThanks for adding the pic to the Tamworth page! Would love you to add more :) -- SatyrTN 15:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- If it fits, you might consider putting the picture of the Chocorua Welcome sign on the Mount Chocorua page? -- SatyrTN
Dunsborough Bakery
editIf you really want to make something about it, see what happened to Alfreds Kitchen in Guildford - :) otherwise it might be worth keeping it more moderate! SatuSuro 12:51, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- No problems - havent been down that way for ages - but am going through Geoff Highams Where was that? gazetteer for more details for the stopping places on the Flinders Bay Branch Railway, and places named by the french - like Cape Naturaliste, Western Australia was a red letter non article for such a long time, only just got it up and running this week.
oh well keep up the good work! SatuSuro 13:03, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Cape Naturaliste
editYes it was an orphan red no for ages and ages, a piccie would be good - thanks. Oh BTW the railway closure date between Bunbury and Busselton is not in Highams book, do you know it? SatuSuro 13:11, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:John Gellibrand 2.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:John Gellibrand 2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:08, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Harold Grimwade.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:Harold Grimwade.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:06, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Australian War Memorial copyright
editHi Hossen, I think that you're asking for trouble by lifting slabs of text from the AWM website. My reading of the AWM copyright statement at: http://www.awm.gov.au/website/copyright.htm is that this material can only be published with the AWM's permission - I don't think that reproducing it on the internet counts as being "personal, non-commercial use" or "use within your organisation". I'd suggest that you paraphrase the AWM's material rather than reproducing it with only minor changes. --Nick Dowling 10:33, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject coordinator election - vote phase!
editThe Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will select seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of eleven candidates. Please vote here by August 26!
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot - 11:44, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Welcome!
editHi, and welcome to the Biography WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of biographies.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.
There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:
- Starting some new articles? Our article structure tips outlines some things to include.
- Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every biography article in Wikipedia.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! plange 06:13, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
krait
editThanks. I'm a little busy with work and a family tragedy at the moment so will only edit occasionally when I have time. Regards Krait 03:57, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Dun Bakery is back
editHi if youre there, we've got an Alfreds Kitchen issue here- I can elaborate if you want :) SatuSuro 15:00, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue VI - August 2006
editThe August 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 12:14, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Strive Banner
editI award you, Hossen27, the Strive banner for Striving in your work with portals. Dfrg.msc User talk:Dfrg.msc 07:15, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- You did the work mate, and you deserve recognition. Dfrg.msc User talk:Dfrg.msc 07:42, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
The s is for striv?
editI award you the striv banner for your great work.
DYK
editbattleships
editHi there; I know that the articles I originally authored on a large number of Victorian era Royal Navy battleships belongb bto Wikipedia and not to me; that is not an issue. But I would be grateful if you could take time to explain why you have rated most of them as Stub-category? Looking at the stated parameters, I would have expected them to be Start-class. Why am I wrong, please?--Anthony.bradbury 17:48, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- I wouldn't dream of changing the categories. I'm not arguing, just asking.--Anthony.bradbury 10:00, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Units section of the Australian military portal
editHi Hossen, How do you add units to the calender? I don't seem to be smart enough to figure it out ;) cheers, --Nick Dowling 11:13, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- I just figured it out - I must be smarter than I thought. This is a great addition to the portal by the way. Thanks for all your hard work on this. --Nick Dowling 11:27, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history Newsletter - Issue VII - September 2006
editThe September 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by Grafikbot - 19:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Military equipment of Australia
editNo worries - I'm happy to be of assistance. --Nick Dowling 03:24, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- I just finished adding an entry for every day of the month. I'm not sure whether the Leeuwin class survey vessel is an Australian designs or even if the design was modified for Australia - I've just assumed that it is. --Nick Dowling 12:17, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VIII - October 2006
editThe October 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 21:47, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Axis naval activity in Australian waters nominated for FA status
editHi Hossen, I have just self-nominated Axis naval activity in Australian waters for Featured Article status. If you'd like to vote or make a comment, the nomination page is: Featured article candidates/Axis naval activity in Australian waters Cheers, --Nick Dowling 22:59, 17 November 2006 (UTC)