HBW 40

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jeremy Horton, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jeremy Horton was changed by HBW 40 (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2008-08-07T14:39:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:39, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Sourcing

Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source as you did to Kimberly Brady is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Reliable sources include soapoperadigest.com and nbc.com. Fan sites like soaps.com, soapcentral.com, soapoperafan.com, are unreliable per WP:V. Thank you. Rm994 (talk) 00:42, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Jan spears listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jan spears. Since you had some involvement with the Jan spears redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 03:15, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Hattie adams listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hattie adams. Since you had some involvement with the Hattie adams redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 03:16, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Casa Condominio Residenza for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Casa Condominio Residenza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casa Condominio Residenza until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --David Tornheim (talk) 01:41, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of X Condominium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article X Condominium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X Condominium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 00:00, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Malibu (Toronto) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malibu (Toronto) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malibu (Toronto) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

rsjaffetalk 16:45, 18 August 2021 (UTC)