H1N111

Edit warring at White Latin American

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User: H1N111 reported by User:Bleckter (Result: Blocked). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:42, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Your recent editing history at White Latin Americans shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

You have been asked to take your content changes to the article's talk page and follow WP:BRD. A section specifically dealing with your changes was opened in November, but you've as yet to engage with other editors there. Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:01, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Talk:White Latin Americans while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address by one person. If this was not your intention, then please always remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:18, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Complaint about your edits at White Latin Americans

See WP:AN3#User: H1N111 reported by User:Bleckter (Result: ). You continued to revert as soon as your last block expired. It seems you are ignoring the advice people have been leaving for you, which requires you to seek consensus. Since there is no other way to get your attention, I've suggested you should be indefinitely blocked. You can respond to the complaint if you wish. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 01:15, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Continued edit warring and personal attacks. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at WP:AN3 (permalink). EdJohnston (talk) 14:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

H1N111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I ask the opinion of a neutral librarian of mi block, and if there is a relationship between bleckter and EdJohnston against me, because this librarian is very supportive to Bleckter, and also, the user blekter, being just a new user, he went immediately with EdJohnston against me, as can be seen in his history, after that the user bleckter accuse me and leave their contributions, he not continued to edit since 6 September and today is 8, the block that the librarian EdJohnston put me, is unjustified, because the reason for the proposal to my block, it was because insulting to another user and performing edit war, That I already explain too many times to EdJohnston, why I reversed the editing of Bleckter, and I put it on the talk page, as he indicated me, but neither he nor the bleckter user, no one put his ideas, the discussion is still unanswered, I promised not insult again the user and and until today, I have not talk to bleckter, also I promised not make a war on page editing white latin american, all that the librarian EdJohnston demanded me, but he responded with a blockade, but unjustified, since I already did not follow either kept making insulting and edit wars, the librarian EdJohnston accused me of insulting the user blecker again, but also is misplaced, because this insult is November 3, and the proposal was 6 , something strange is happening here and clearly that is against me, Cheers. --H1N111 (talk) 18:34, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You have blatantly continued your battlefield approach to edit warring and have blatantly continued to insult your opponent - and it was during the last few days, and did not end in early November. If you genuinely cannot see that, then I really don't see how unblocking you would be a good idea. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:27, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.