GraemeKad, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi GraemeKad! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Recent edit to Colonsay

edit

  Hello. I noticed that you made an edit that introduces praise or promotional language to the Colonsay article. On Wikipedia, we adhere to a neutral point of view (NPOV) and avoid promotional language or puffery. Please read the NPOV policy page, as well as this page of language to avoid to better understand how to expand this article in a style suitable to an encyclopedia. If you have questions, please see the Help Desk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 12:51, 9 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Events on René Guénon article

edit

Hello GraemeKad,

I owe you explanations on my edit on René Guénon's article. This article, in its most elaborated form, has been written by now banned user TwoHorned. This goes back to that version in the history of the article, please get a read of it. If you're a bit learnid on that author, you'll notice the exactness and quality of that older version of René Guénon article. This user TwoHorned has been banned following actions of another banned user Hkelkar. That user (it's probably a she, but no matter) is the source of a considerable number of sockpuppets and trouble on en:wikipedia. You can have a funny portrayal here, to get an idea of the disaster. It turns out that Hkelkar has developped anger and hate against TwoHorned. The animosity goes back to this arbitration. Reading it, it's very funny ti understand the root of Hkelkar's hate. The main point here is that Dekacarandaebonelm is obviously another sprout of Hkelkar (among many others not yet in list). Have a look of when Dekacarandaebonelm appeared, when he/she left, and what he/she did in-between and you'll have an obvious depiction of a revenge act. All of this is pure shit, of course, and I don't give a damn about it, the main point is that the restitution of TwoHorned's version is necessary for having a correct article on René Guénon, please read the history and I'm sure you'll be convinced. Sincerely, 82.98.7.229 (talk) 15:07, 27 December 2017 (UTC).Reply

Please source your edits

edit

See WP:VERIFY and WP:RS. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 17:00, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please don't revert-war with other editors

edit

Especially when it's to insert redundancies and odd words like, "slained." Thanks. - CorbieV 23:01, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

It was not "xenophobia"

edit

Thanks, GraemeKad. I was going to come back after my edit, I also felt this was a misuse of the term. There are still three further mentions of the term in the article and the article is included in the Xenophobia in Asia category. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 14:08, 21 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, GraemeKad. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

January 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm CorbieVreccan. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Boann, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - CorbieV 00:13, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply