Goswami21
Welcome!
editWelcome to Wikipedia, BIKASH NANDA GOSWAMI! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Karimganj district. I am Vinegarymass911 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or . Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
Since you've shown some interest in editing topics related to Bangladesh, we hope you'll stay and add content to Bangladesh related articles. A number of important articles related to Bangladesh are yet to be created and many of the existing ones are in poor shape. You can help it improve by becoming a regular editor with adhering to the policies of Wikipedia. Consider joining or watchlisting Bangladesh related discussions (for example, Noticeboard for Bangladesh-related topics).
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Vinegarymass911 (talk) 16:00, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
BIKASH NANDA GOSWAMI, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi BIKASH NANDA GOSWAMI! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 23 July 2019 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Assam have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. - Arjayay (talk) 11:52, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
July 2019
editPlease refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Assam. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:41, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Karimganj Junction railway station, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 17:33, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Karimganj Junction railway station, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Do not delete existing references and related content without valid justification. Dl2000 (talk) 17:33, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Wrong Information
editYou are just giving wrong, incomplete details & previous wiki page was a dull page. BIKASH NANDA GOSWAMI (talk) 17:38, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
editHi BIKASH NANDA GOSWAMI! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Indic Scripts
editHello BIKASH NANDA GOSWAMI, please note: Indic scripts in leads and infoboxes. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:56, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
- Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Karimganj Junction railway station, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:25, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
editYou are welcome
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:50, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:18, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editDisambiguation link notification for November 25
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 Indian general election in Assam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
DS alert
editThis is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
December 2019
editYou currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Citizenship Amendment Act protests; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
The page is under WP:1RR so you should self revert and discuss on the talk page or face blocking for Edit warring. Happy Holidays! ᗙ DBigXrayᗙ 13:48, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
February 2020
editPlease do not add or change content, as you did at Bengali Brahmins, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:12, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Do not add entries of WP:BLPs in Bengali Brahmins article since as per consensus at WP:INB, caste needs to be self-identified by the person in an interview. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:19, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Chuni Goswami; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Coderzombie (talk) 17:08, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
Rajya sabha vacancies.
edit20 vacancies, not19 .
18 regular, 1 bihar sharad yadav, 1 UP beni prasad Manish9893 (talk) 16:01, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
It could be 20, but according to the citation, it is 19. Goswami666 (talk) 16:15, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
May 2020
editWelcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from 2020 Tablighi Jamaat coronavirus hotspot in Delhi. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SerChevalerie (talk) 12:57, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Regarding Migrated Cases in COVID-19 pandemic in Assam
editHi, regarding our disscussion on your Wikidata talk page, i have a solution for the mismatch of Active cases in infobox, if we show recovery cases as it is shown by state government dashoard, other official updates as well as MoHFW which shows it 54 as of now). For that in active cases you don't have to remove the code but just simply subtract 3 and it will match with other updates. Note can be added against Active cases in infobox that 3 migrated cases are subtracted from the total. I hope this addresses you issue. Thanks - Mayankj429 (talk) 04:19, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Let's wait for the other user, since one user has agreed to add the migrations to recoveries Goswami666 (talk) 10:13, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 14
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited COVID-19 pandemic in Assam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Azara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Covid-19 Assam Page
editHi Goswami666 (talk · contribs) , you just reverted some of my edits on COVID-19 pandemic in Assam about total number of tests (which was clarified on 13th June by Facebook Page of National Health Mission Assam that total cases crossed 200000 in June till now [1]) and statistics district wise but you could have clarified reason for it , Thanks Branstarx3 (talk) 17:46, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
June 2022
editHello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at 2020 China–India skirmishes. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Drat8sub (talk) 22:22, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Covid-19 Tripura page
editHi Goswami666 (talk · contribs), requesting you to please look into Tripura page and please make necessary updates.
Thanks, Vikram Maingi (talk) 14:44, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hello Goswami666 (talk · contribs), request you to please look into Tripura page and provide your updates.Thanks, Vikram Maingi (talk) 08:35, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Is it truly better (to write people instead of humans)?
editNot arguing, just wondering. Care to explain? Also, what wrestler is the most important wrestler for a non-wrestling fan to read about intently on Wikipedia? The fate of a list of a Wikiproject depends on the answer to that last question! The first one's more just small talk, like chickens and hamsters make. Are hamsters even a thing in India? Anyway, good luck with that weather, and don't forget to root for your local sports team, brother, whatever they may be! InedibleHulk (talk) 04:35, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Lol!!!! Goswami666 (talk) 12:11, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 25
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited COVID-19 pandemic in Assam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jammu and Kashmir.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
September 2020
editPlease do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate Talk 03:12, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
October 2020
editPlease do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Republic TV. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate Talk 23:17, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Republic TV has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate Talk 12:48, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
About image uploading
editHi Goswami666,Can you tell me please about the procedure for the image uploading in Wikipedia article?can download image can be uploaded on Wikipedia? please kindly answer me.
Thank you
(Fade258 (talk) 12:01, 3 October 2020 (UTC))
http://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard Click this link, and follow the steps Goswami666 (talk) 12:35, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Tayi Arajakate Talk 16:45, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- This discussion has been moved to the conflict of interest noticeboard at WP:COIN § User:Goswami666: Promotional editing & other problems. — Newslinger talk 11:02, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
October 2020
editPlease stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Republic TV, you may be blocked from editing. — Newslinger talk 22:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Republic TV has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 22:31, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Would you mind responding to the issues brought up here? WP:COIN § User:Goswami666: Promotional editing & other problems Tayi Arajakate Talk 03:47, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editMarch 2021
editThis is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Republic TV, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SUN EYE 1 16:09, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 20
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karimganj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
editNovember 2021
editPlease refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate Talk 23:58, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
2021 Assam Legislative Assembly election
editYou reverted my edit here. I thought my edit summary was clear, but I'll explain in detail each change.
- For INC-AIUDF breakup, I replaced republic with Express.
- republic ref for poll dates, phases etc was completely covered by India Today ref. So I removed it
- In both repoll and Voter stats, republic refs were not needed as India Today refs before covered them.
- In Aftermath, why is history of AASU/Sonowal/Sarma necessary? The previous line sets up the CM choice dilemma which is relevant to this article. For more details on history, Sarma/Sonowal pages have that data.
- Aftermath paragraph has several WP:POV, even WP:OR things which aren't even in the referenced source; like - "This makes Sonowal a perfect person to lead the party in terms of protecting regional and cultural identities of the state", "Also its victory in 2021 is also due to his ability to bring people on his side"
I'll split my edit into two. I don't think you have issues with removing superfluous sourcing, so I'll go ahead and do that. About the Aftermath paragraph, I'll await your input here. Hemanthah (talk) 04:07, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Goswami21, can you respond about the Aftermath section length? Hemanthah (talk) 06:02, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Goswami21, if you don't care to discuss, may be you shouldn't be too quick to revert prima-facie good, informed edits. Hemanthah (talk) 19:27, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Mentioning caste in a BLP
editHi, per our policy, we can only mention castes in a living person's article if they have self-identified it in media (inerviews, SM posts from official handle, autobiography), and not if mentioned by a third-party. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:24, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
May 2024
editHello, I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2024 Indian general election in Kerala have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. You did not provide any reason in edit summary regarding your revert. Please consider using talk page. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ✠ ZenDragoX✠ (contact) 04:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC) ✠ ZenDragoX✠ (contact) 04:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about S. B. Deorah College
editHello Goswami21, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, S. B. Deorah College, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. B. Deorah College.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|GrabUp}}
. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Speedy deletion nomination of S. B. Deorah College
editIf this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on S. B. Deorah College requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://sbdeorahcollege.org.in/history.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GrabUp - Talk 10:27, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Going against consensus
editYou removed the redirect and recreated the article again, even after a consensus was reached at AfD to redirect it. If you go against consensus again, I will have to involve admins and request action against you. GrabUp - Talk 11:44, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- I have given new citations havent you seen that... the sources have complete details about the college... So a modified article... can be recreated again Goswami21 (talk) 16:32, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- If you have any problem nominate this again... I have recreated it after citing proper source which wasnt added earlier... Goswami21 (talk) 16:37, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Its not the same content that I have added... Its modified and fixed... So I didnt recreated the same thing... Goswami21 (talk) 16:40, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- I think you have some mental issue... even after adding proper sources this time, which you said in previous nominations... you still have some problem or issue with this article that you want it to get redirected again... you not even want proper nomination this time... Goswami21 (talk) 16:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Goswami21, you can't violate the outcome of an AFD consensus. If you would like for this article to exist again, you have to work on a draft version and submit it to WP:AFC for review. You can't just try and reverse an AFD outcome. Alternatively, if you disagree with the AFD closure, you can file an appeal at Deletion review but you'll need to present a convincing argument. Consider these alternatives once your block is over. Liz Read! Talk! 04:21, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
ANI discussion
editThere is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GrabUp - Talk 17:13, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
December 2024
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bbb23 (talk) 17:32, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Bora Service moved to draftspace
editThanks for your contributions to Bora Service. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:50, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Contentious topics alert
editYou have recently made edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. This is a standard message to inform you that India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS. — Newslinger talk 03:34, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Unexplained removal of reliably sourced content
editHi Goswami21, please do not remove reliably sourced content from articles without adequate explanation in an edit summary, as you did on the Republic TV article in Special:Diff/1264387234 and Special:Diff/1264387497. Also, keep in mind that the Republic TV article is under the scope of the India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan contentious topic. Please see the following messages for more information. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 03:50, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Standard warning
editPlease do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Republic TV, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. — Newslinger talk 03:50, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
How to use edit summaries
editHello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Republic TV did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.
The edit summary field looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. — Newslinger talk 03:50, 26 December 2024 (UTC)