April 2021

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kristin Cavallari have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:50, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kristin Cavallari. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 13:51, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kristin Cavallari, you may be blocked from editing. RacoonyRE Message meContributions 14:01, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Lauren Conrad. RacoonyRE Message meContributions 14:05, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  331dot (talk) 14:07, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

April 2021

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lauren Conrad have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:04, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kristin Cavallari. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kristin Cavallari was changed by GiantEagleMontrose (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959669 on 2021-04-05T19:05:01+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:05, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kristin Cavallari. Ashleyyoursmile! 19:08, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ixfd64 (talk) 19:12, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GiantEagleMontrose (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am sorry for my disruptive behavior. GiantEagleMontrose (talk) 19:10, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GiantEagleMontrose (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am sorry for my disruptive behavior. GiantEagleMontrose (talk) 00:45, 10 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

An apology is a good start, but to be unblocked we need some idea of the contributions you wish to make, such as what articles or topic areas you want to edit. As this request does not do that, I am declining it. Further unproductive requests could lead to your access to this page being removed. 331dot (talk) 00:50, 10 April 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GiantEagleMontrose (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was a disruptive behavior because I vandalized Wikipedia. GiantEagleMontrose (talk) 00:54, 10 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GiantEagleMontrose (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Can I get my editing rights back? It's been 5 months when I was again blocked. During this time I did not edit other pages. GiantEagleMontrose (talk) 16:52, 18 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

  Confirmed block evasion as Core2021. Block strengthened as a result. Yamla (talk) 17:51, 18 September 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.