GZee

Douglas Bush

Thanks for your message. Actually I was pleased that someone added Aharon Lichtenstein's name to the list of students at Douglas Bush--I think it's interesting that Bush had influence in such disparate fields, and I think it's equally interesting that Lichtenstein had such a distinguished background in English literature. Chick Bowen 18:21, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

List of United States presidential vetoes

I saw your date changes on the recent set of Bill Clinton vetoes I dumped in (at least, his vetoes in the 105th and 106th Congresses). Personally though, your new date format is a little weird and a bit repetitive, for example seeing:

• 1997 Jun 09:
• 1997 Oct 10:
• 1997 Nov 13:
• 1998 May 20:
• 1998 Jun 23:

...and so on. Clinton made ~13 vetoes in 98-99, so the years start to get repetitive, and the month abbreviation is a little too informal for me. However, I can see how saying June 9, 1997 is a little weird (it's what I'm used to, but it's a weird order). What about instead breaking it up so that there's one mention of year, and then each line has the month and day, e.g.:

• 106th Congress
  • 1999 (1st Session)
    • September 23: HR 2488
    • September 28: HR 2587
    • October 18: HR 2606
    • October 25: HR 2670
    • November 3: HR 3064
  • 2000 (2nd Session)
    • April 25: S 1287
    • August 5: HR 4810

...and so on (I don't want to write down all the budget bills he nailed that year). Thoughts? And if you want to dig in on populating some veto listings, take a look at [1] or the listings at THOMAS (select "Search Bill Summary, Status" near the top, then click the number Congress near the top, and then finally choose "Vetoed Bills" near the bottom). –Pakman044 04:21, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

November 2016

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Donald Trump. Stop adding "climate change denier" to articles. Doc talk 08:21, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

The climate change denial section under Donald Trump clearly documents how he has repeatedly denied that climate change is happening GZee (talk) 18:00, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:RainbowCoockies.jpg

The file File:RainbowCoockies.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned file with no clear usability on project.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Katten Muchin Rosenman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katten Muchin Rosenman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katten Muchin Rosenman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   01:01, 23 March 2018 (UTC)