User talk:GTrang/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

→

Archive 10

Happy New Year

Savvyjack23 (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Savvyjack23 (talk) 07:39, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Template:Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Use mdy dates

Please see [1]; the discussion having fizzled out, I just now closed it as no-consensus. Nyttend (talk) 00:16, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:2063 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:2063, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for revert my page mudichur

GeoffreyT2000 thanks some body deleted content in my page and you have reverted back thanks keep watch it bro — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dineshyazz (talk • contribs) 05:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Time and Date (website) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Time and Date (website), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:42, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2063

Hello, GeoffreyT2000. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "2063".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Slightly confused on your recent AFD nomination

How does World Youth Organization (United Kingdom) fall into any AFD if it has reliable sources from governmental websites from the United Kingdom, and media sites with the likes from IMDb, please? I think you have unfairly nominated the page for deletion. Satnder63 (talk) 20:24, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Technical move of a Current events archive

Please see my reply at WP:RMTR. There is something funny about this archive. Via Whatlinkshere I found it is linked to from Portal talk:Current events. See where it mentions 'Old talk: Current events archives'? If you go into the wikisource you will see that Archive 12 is linking to Talk:April 2005, that was later moved to Portal talk:Current events/April 2005. Is that the material that ought to be in Archive 12? If so should we just change the Archive 12 link to point to the new location? Can you look into the current status? Especially good if you can find who added the pointers to the 'Old talk' archives. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 20:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Offensive username?

I'm nonplussed by your report of RealsAreASubsetOfComplex as an offensive username. What's offensive about it? Compare also the account's only contribution here. Bishonen | talk 22:12, 15 February 2016 (UTC).

+1 to Bishonen's concern here. It looks like you were patrolling with Twinkle or something ... you've got to remember that robotically clicking "offensive" can make you look stupid sometimes. Daniel Case (talk) 23:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Perhaps a mere misclick? Anyway, it probably never reached the eyes of the new user. It's not necessary to be unkind, Daniel. Bishonen | talk 08:24, 16 February 2016 (UTC).

Redirect categorization

Hi GeoffreyT2000! You've been interested in redirect categorization and the This is a redirect template in the past, so I wanted to let you know that there is a discussion at Template talk:This is a redirect#One parameter that might interest you.  Good faith! Paine  21:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Admin noticeboard request

Hello! I have responded to your request to remove my autopatrolled rights at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Fungus Guy. Cheers! FUNgus guy (talk) 06:40, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Bitredeconion for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bitredeconion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitredeconion until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 03:57, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

PROD of Gavan Duffy

Hey, I removed your PROD from Gavan_Duffy_(disambiguation) after trying to clean it up so there was more than one link on the disambiguation page - since your PROD was on account of it being a one-link disambig, I figured correcting the problem would remove the need for deletion. The page now links to five different articles. I thought it'd be best for me to let you know & to explain why I did it - I dunno if there were any other issues with the page I wasn't aware of. Gimubrc (talk) 17:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Operation Syndicate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Williams. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Re: Message on my talk page

With regards to this message on my talk page, there is a complete misunderstanding. I did not cut and paste the article, that was someone else. There might have been a contribution on my part, but I sure as heck didn't cut & paste it at least to my memory.--Taeyebaar (talk) 21:26, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

This millennium and Current millennium listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect This millennium and Current millennium. Since you had some involvement with the This millennium and Current millennium redirects, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 05:52, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Current century listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Current century. Since you had some involvement with the Current century redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 05:56, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Address Na, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Janaki, Kalinga and Subha. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Archive page

I can manage my own archive pages, and move content that doesn't belong there when someone tells me about it. . The simplest thing will be for you to revert your MfD tag. DGG ( talk ) 01:02, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Canon Sinuum

Hi GeoffreyT2000, you have recently decided to remove several pages related to this topic. In addition, you have stated that an entire section on other canon sinuums was not necessary. I wonder why? I believe that you know very little about this topic, and you are unaware that canon sinuum is a generic term for a table of sines. It does not identify a particular table, this is why the current state of things is inadequate. If you wish to remove the section on other canons, fine, but then do the right thing, namely introduce a disambiguation page. There are really more than three Canon Sinuums, but it is your right not to believe it. Btw, you seem to be posting under this ID only for a year, but I believe that you have been contributing to Wikipedia before. Therefore, you must know that one of the duties of Wikipedia contributors, you, as well as me, is to be honest, and not biased. The changes that you have introduced are biased. I don't know why, perhaps you have a stake in one of the tables? I am not going to argue further, as I have not tried to introduce changes for me, but for others. Your changes will only make me more wary of your contributions. Please, destroy the pages that you wish to destroy, I have plenty of work to do outside of Wikipedia.Schwilgue (talk) 22:39, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi again Geoffrey. From what I can see, you are 15 years old, and I wonder what you know of tables of sines. Could you expand on that? You have been contributing to Wikipedia for one year, and you are deleting useful material from others. You have removed parts that you, at 15 years of age, deem unnecessary, but without any evidence. You have scheduled one Canon Sinuum page for deletion, but not another one, which seems rather biased. Also, the Canon Sinuum page is ambiguous, whether you like it or not. Perhaps you should first study some history and advance math before deleting material from others? Perhaps you could tell us your background in mathematics and history? And do you read latin?Schwilgue (talk) 22:50, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

2016-17 NBA season

The 2016-17 NBA season has some information but why did you redirect it was just fine but now there's no informantion 68.102.40.154 (talk) 17:39, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Windows Redstone listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Windows Redstone. Since you had some involvement with the Windows Redstone redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  — Scott • talk 15:17, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected

Hey there, I protected your talk page for a couple of day. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:19, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logistics (film)

Yes, its original author apparently did not understand MOS:FILM, but what you brought to AFD has been improved and sourced to meet WP:N#Other evidence of notability as longest film ever. Just sayin'. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 19:28, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Kudpung. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, B9176 road, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:46, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

The user Salter

Check out his history-he is removing prods from EVERY page https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Special:Contributions/Salter212 Wgolf (talk) 17:42, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Garagepunk66. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Dreams of the Fallen, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Garagepunk66 (talk) 04:18, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Clean ring

Would it be possible to include in the article

• a reason for singling out this particular class of rings for attention by giving them a name?
• a reason for calling them "clean"?
• some examples?

Michael Hardy (talk) 21:06, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Widr (talk) 22:28, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:The Lying Game (TV series)#Requested move 26 June 2016

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:The Lying Game (TV series)#Requested move 26 June 2016. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:39, 26 June 2016 (UTC)