Fuglelort
Thanks for your contributions to RUSK. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and it needs better sources to establish notability and it needs a rewrite to get rid of the chatty and personal tone.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 08:57, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of RUSK
editHello Fuglelort,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged RUSK for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Rusk (band)
editHi my friend Fuglelort. I hope you are fine. You do not appear familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The general information on new page creation found HERE and especially HERE may help you, as may the referencing for beginners tutorial. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE, regarding verifiability and HERE, regarding the need to maintain a neutral point of view. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! I hope this helps. Good luck and best wishes, BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 16:50, 25 November 2024 (UTC)