User talk:Frood/Archive/7/2020

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Bgrus22 in topic Proposed deletion of Yutabon


DS Notice

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

It is not permissible to engage in highly personalized WP:ASPERSIONS and WP:BATTLEGROUND behavior [1] on Wikipedia, especially over socio-political viewpoints, and most especially over ones covered by discretionary sanctions, as is human sexuality and gender, broadly construed. Injecting such material into discussions which don't even relate to the matter you're going off about is especially ill-advised.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  21:54, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

k – Frood (talk) 18:16, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yutabon

 

The article Yutabon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

See below, the youtuber is of relatively little importance with few subscribers and short lived coverage. It should be obvious that he does not meet notoriety requirements based on this.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgrus22 (talk) 23:20, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

@Bgrus22: I'm not sure why you notified me? The only edit I've ever made to that page was to revert vandalism. – Frood (talk) 23:33, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
@Frood: only 3 people have contributed to this page so I just notified everyone. Bgrus22 (talk) 00:49, 23 July 2020 (UTC)