User talk:FrickFrack/Archive 1

Welcome to Wikipedia! Have you been doing the edits to the One Life to Live page? If you have, they're stellar! I've been waiting for a soap opera contributor to come along; I've done most of the work. Reply on your talk page or mine, whichever is convenient for you. To sign your name, type four tildes (four of ~). Mike H 20:20, Jul 8, 2004 (UTC)

thanks

edit

Yes I have been editing the One Life to Live page. I saw the "Guiding Light" and "As The World Turns" pages, and thought there was more to be said about "One Life to Live". Also, I edited Erika Slezak's page and added a pic. Thanks for the complement. Johnnyjoe23

Johnnyjoe23 20:29, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Do you post at any soap opera boards? I post at WoST and TWoP. In any case, it's great to have someone else with soap expertise editing. Check User:TheCustomOfLife/Articles to see the articles I've written. The one I'm most proud of (and got nominated for Featured Article Status) was Another World (soap opera). Mike H 20:36, Jul 8, 2004 (UTC)

I posted previously on WoST and occasionally do so at the ABC One Life to Live Message Boards.

It's always good to have a second opinion. Feel free to edit mistakes in my articles. Put Category:Soap operas in the search engine to see all of the soap opera listings at Wikipedia. Mike H 20:44, Jul 8, 2004 (UTC)

I had a question at Talk:Ellen Holly. Maybe you can help me answer it. Mike H 22:45, Jul 8, 2004 (UTC)


all my children

Columbia

edit

Hi Johnnyjoe, I changed the "most prestigious" part of the Columbia University GSOJ page to "one of the most" since we have in general tried to stay away from declaring anything "the most" unless it is quantifiable. Hope to see you around Wikipedia. Thanks. Fuzheado | Talk 23:52, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Soap opera actors

edit

When you create a new soap opera actor page, add them to Category:Soap opera actors by using Wiki-links ([[ ]]) and placing in the links: Category:Soap opera actors|Last name, first name. I think I added the category to every existing OLTL profile as of yesterday. Mike H 23:59, Jul 15, 2004 (UTC)

Erika Slezak

edit

Please review Wikipedia's Neutral point of view policy. RickK 05:13, Jul 20, 2004 (UTC)

Publicity photos

edit

The photographers of the publicity photos you've posted of Susan Lucci, Erika Slezak, etc. may not like their work posted here without being notified. As such, I have changed the pictures in the articles to fair use screenshots, something I know for sure we can use. Tell me if I missed any. Mike H 00:12, Aug 5, 2004 (UTC)

I would appreciate it in future if you consulted me before you chopped off such a big chunk of the soap template. Mike H 05:48, Aug 21, 2004 (UTC)

I apologize for chopping it off. I was doing little cuts and snip-its to the OLTL site and thought that if I chopped off some of the soaps on the template box that it would only affect the OLTL site. It was only afterwards I realized my mistake and tried to fix it.

No problem. Mike H 21:30, Aug 23, 2004 (UTC)

Erin Torpey

edit

I'm going to ask Rick, but I'm sure she said goodbye to Viki in the very last week of 2002. I know IMDB says 2003 but IMDB is often wrong. Mike H 21:30, Aug 23, 2004 (UTC)

Cuts at The Jeffersons

edit

Hi Joey! Please see: Talk:The Jeffersons Thanks! Quill 00:22, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Hello Johnnyjoe23. Could you comment briefly at Talk:The Jeffersons about the changes you made? Thanks. ffirehorse 00:55, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)

If I came across as having an attitude, I apologize. ffirehorse 01:42, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Your images

edit

Hi there! Thanks for adding the image Image:Miami brickell.jpg. It currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, and I was hoping that you would add one as untagged images may be deleted eventually. (You can use {{gfdl}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) Thanks! --David Iberri | Talk 19:27, Oct 29, 2004 (UTC)

Could you also provide source information (and perhaps update the image copyright tags) of these images too?

Thanks! --David Iberri | Talk 19:35, Oct 29, 2004 (UTC)

Also:

Metromover

edit

I see you've been doing lots of work on Metromover and other Miami public transit. I took the liberty of creating a new category, Miami Metromover, which is a subcategory of Metro and I have added the Metromover stations, just empty placeholders where there was not an existing entry. I tried writing some of the station guides but not knowing the geography (I'm in London) I wasn't very successful and gave up rather than risk writing something misleading. --Minority Report|Talk 16:32, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)

South Florida

edit

Hi, I see you have changed the ranking of South Florida metropoliatan area from 10th to 6th. To follow your line of facts, you may as well change the United States metropolitan area, as that Wikipedia page lists the area as being 13th.--Mad Max 22:49, Nov 26, 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

edit

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

You just copied the contents of this to Tri-Rail/Metrorail Transfer Station, which I had moved it from. First of all, this is not the proper way to move a page; you should use the move link, or, it that doesn't work, put it on Wikipedia:Requested moves. Second, I believe it is Wikipedia policy not to use / in the title of an article, as that implies a subpage. --SPUI 23:56, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Now you're doing the same with the Tri-Rail stations. Please stop, especially since you are not moving them correctly. Also, the standard for Wikipedia, at least in the US, is Foo (System station) - Wikipedia:Naming conventions (stations). --SPUI 00:02, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Are you sure that the yard trackage used by Amtrak in Hialeah is owned by Metrorail, or does Metrorail maybe have a separate yard? --SPUI 19:52, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Sorry for being unclear - I was referring to http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Amtrak&curid=51928&diff=0&oldid=0 . --SPUI 20:00, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Robin Strasser

edit

I reverted your edits about her middle name. I was editing from an anon IP at the time, and IMDB says that this is her correct middle name. Considering the date she was born, it seems valid. Mike H 17:58, Jan 1, 2005 (UTC)

How to create highlighted maps

edit

I wanted to know how to create a highlighted map? Could you get me some tips or link me to a page on this site to how to create one?

User:Leonard23 May 31, 2005 (UTC)

Farley Granger & Sammy Davis Jr.

edit

Hi, imdb incorrectly lists them. The award Sammy David Jr was nominated for was in 1980, not 1979, and was actually won by Hugh McPhillips from Days of Our Lives. The 1977 awards did not have a supporting actor category. Granger was nominated in the Best Actor category but lost. Seee this page for more info [1]. Thanks for your attention though. - PS I have informed imdb of the incorrect listings so they should be changed in a few weeks. Dowew 20:53, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

-Further more please see the Wikipedia pages about the Daytime Emmy Awards

M-DCPS

edit

Hey, Thanks for your great contributions to the M-DCPS article, but I have a question about Booker T. According to Miami-Dade's website, and the school's own site, Washington was opened and built in 1986, the comment you added to the article doesn't reflect that, perhaps the original B.T. Washington was not the same as the current one, or is there some sort of mistake there? I always heard Edison was the first black school in Miami, but I could be wrong. What do you think? -- PRueda29 Ptalk29 23:36, 16 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

OK, I understand now. -- PRueda29 Ptalk29 23:47, 16 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:Metro.JPG

edit
 
This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Metro.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stan 06:01, 15 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:Erika_Slezak.JPG

edit
 
This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Erika_Slezak.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --OrphanBot 12:28, 27 January 2006 (UTC)Reply


Image Tagging Image:Miamidowntown.JPG

edit
 
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Miamidowntown.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jaranda wat's sup 22:13, 25 February 2006 (UTC)Reply


Image Tagging Image:Govtcntr.jpg

edit
 
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Govtcntr.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dethomas 23:51, 3 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:MDT_Metrorail_Extensions.PNG

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:MDT_Metrorail_Extensions.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 02:29, 17 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:Baysideapproach.jpg

edit
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Baysideapproach.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

-SCEhardT 04:40, 15 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source for Image:Govtctr.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Govtctr.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. User:Angr 10:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

No source image

edit

Image:Marston Brier.jpg has no source and will be deleted in 7 days. YellowDot 03:20, 3 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:Img 13374.jpg listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Img 13374.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you.

Image tagging for Image:1968.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:1968.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:49, 7 November 2006 (UTC)Reply


Image:Civicclibrary.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Civicclibrary.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --– Quadell (talk) (random) 20:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for Image:1971.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:1971.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:54, 9 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:DouglasRoad.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:DouglasRoad.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok 05:14, 22 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Michellewilliams doyouknow.jpg)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Michellewilliams doyouknow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 01:53, 26 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:John-Mayer-Daughters.jpg)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:John-Mayer-Daughters.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 14:16, 26 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:FMcast.jpg)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:FMcast.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 22:42, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Brandon Buddy/AfD

edit

Hi, I just recreated a page for Brandon Buddy (Cole Thornhart) of One Life to Live, which apparently has been previously deleted at least once due to "lack of notability." Obviously, he is a new actor, but his status as a contract player on OLTL makes him notable, no? In any case, I was hoping you and others who have contributed to OLTL pages could comment on the article's talk page regarding this deletion issue. Thanks in advance. TAnthony 04:27, 6 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for Image:Patti LaBelle - If You Asked Me To.JPG

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Patti LaBelle - If You Asked Me To.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:07, 10 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Category:African-American Academy Award winners

edit

The category you wrote, Category:African-American Academy Award winners, is uncategorized. Please help improve it by adding it to one or more categories, so it may be associated with related categories. Eli Falk 14:10, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Cargiveaway.JPG listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cargiveaway.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 17:37, 9 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:RobinChristopher.jpg)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:RobinChristopher.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:15, 14 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:MiamiHeraldlogo.JPG)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:MiamiHeraldlogo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:10, 20 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sonny and Carly Corinthos

edit

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Sonny and Carly Corinthos, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --Elonka 08:47, 28 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:Clint Viki.jpg

edit
  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Clint Viki.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:Miamiseal.JPG

edit
  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Miamiseal.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:MiamiHeraldlogo.JPG

edit
  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:MiamiHeraldlogo.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:HowDoILive.jpg

edit
  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:HowDoILive.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Percysledge.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Percysledge.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Tri_rail_map.gif

edit

I have tagged Image:Tri_rail_map.gif as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 03:33, 27 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:MiamiHeraldlogo.JPG

edit
  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:MiamiHeraldlogo.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:14, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Percysledge.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Percysledge.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:37, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:Onmyown.jpg

edit
  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Onmyown.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)Reply