Free1Soul

WP:HOUND

Please read and internalize WP:HOUNDING, unless you would like others to return the favor. Thanks in advance. nableezy - 17:38, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Is that a threat? I undid your mass change, to multiple articles, that was objected to by User:Arminden. You are editing against consensus, replicating your change to 20 more articles while your original change is under discussion is disruptive. Free1Soul (talk) 17:42, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

You did not actually discuss anything, you just said this is better. I disagree. If youd like to discuss something, the talk page is for that. Your laughable claim that I am editing against consensus is just that, laughable. Is it a threat? No, it is a promise. If you continue to follow me around I will either report it or return the favor. nableezy - 17:45, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

I did not hound you - I challenged a disruptive edit you replicated to many articles. Your threat to hound me in return is tantamount to a harrassment tactic or retaliation. Free1Soul (talk) 17:54, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

You hounded me to an AFD and then to 15 articles lol. Good luck with that one. nableezy - 17:56, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Hounded you to an AfD? I regularly participate in Israel related AFDs. AFDs are posted in public so editors will come and vote. I request you strike this false allegation - and apologise for making threats on my talk page - or I WILL take this ELSEWHERE.Free1Soul (talk) 18:03, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Was not in the Israel related AFD list prior to you hounding me there. Likewise the talk page at Caesarea Philippi, a page you had never been on. Will very much not be striking anything, and if youd like to make a report feel free. I wonder what an uninvolved editor would do seeing your edits today were all immediately following me. nableezy - 18:05, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Icewhiz, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:09, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Not me. Free1Soul (talk) 19:55, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

ANI

I wanted to notify you that there is a discussion going on at ANI. While you are not the primary topic of this discussion you have been mentioned more than once. See: [1]. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 00:09, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Please comment

here --> [2]. Thank you. - GizzyCatBella🍁 01:48, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Copy my appeal to AN, my edits were already discussed at AN

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Free1Soul (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please, please, please someone copy to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. My edits were already discussed there a year ago! Over a year ago I fixed a few dozen errors in nationality. It is "a Jordanian", not "an Jordanian". It is "an Israeli" not "an Israelian" or "a Israeli". I fixed other errors, not just a and an, like: Iraqian to Iraqi ([3] [4]), Arabian to Saudi or Arab ([5] and then fixed [6] [7]), and Israelian ([8] [9]) My edits were already discussed at AN in this discussion. Consensus of the discussion was as put by User:Asartea: "A quick spot check of some of their contributions shows nothing indicating bad-faith in my opinion. Lots of gnomy edits which is probably why they were editing so fast but no POV pushing, vandalism or other bad behavior. Regarding but until they got over 500 they avoided virtually all articles relevant to ARBPIA considering in my vague memories that area is chockfull of warnings and ECP that isn't that abnormal". Nothing wrong. These even aren't most of my edits. I have made hundreds of edits since, mostly to food articles. I made hundreds of edits before the nationality fixes, mostly to food articles. I am also Israeli. I am interested in articles in the region. Now over a year later, HJ Mitchell decided by himself that any editor that fixes this type of grammar error, a instead of an or the other way around, is 90% a sock. This is against the discussion that already took place a year ago at AN, where such editing was considered natural and helpful. Minor copyediting is also suggested in Wikipedia:Growth Team features#Newcomer tasks and this project. I request that the previous discussion be upheld, that HJ Mitchell's action be overtured, and that my rights as an editor be restored. Free1Soul (talk) 06:40, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Moot as account is globally locked. -- Euryalus (talk) 06:49, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Copied. nableezy - 17:14, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank you User:Nableezy. I have read not flattering things about you on the web and people told me things too. But I have to say that you are a mensch, despite what these people say. My mother always told me that being a mensch is the most important thing. Free1Soul (talk) 18:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

My Yiddish is a little weak but I know that one, so thank you. I will tell you though that I dont think the appeal is going to go anywhere. Youre not really addressing the topic here, your challenge is that because some other discussion didnt find you to be a sock or gaming that some new discussion cannot change that finding. You need to address the actual issue here, are you Icewhiz (or User:יניב_הורון for that matter). You need to convince people that this is your only account, and the unblock request doesnt address that at all. Im not actually sure how to convince people of something like that, bit of a quandary proving a negative tbh. If this is your first account say that directly. If it is not then admit to it and ask for forgiveness. Those are the choices here. nableezy - 18:15, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

User:Nableezy. Please copy over that this is my first and only account. I was at a Wikipedia workshop in my town over a year ago where the instructor was very angry at some Wikipedia editors but also brought up some useful editing tips. I do not know Yaniv or Icewhiz, I am not them, how can I prove to you I am not them? Those two editors did not edit food articles like I do. Free1Soul (talk) 18:55, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Copied. nableezy - 19:14, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Those two editors did not edit food articles you say? Let’s see..

[10]<-->[11]

[12]<-->[13]

[14]<-->[15]

[16]<-->[17]

[18]<-->[19]

[20]<-->[21]

[22]<-->[23]

[24]<-->[25]

[26]<-->[27]

[28]<-->[29] etc, etc... are you sure about that? - GizzyCatBella🍁 05:03, 16 December 2021 (UTC)