Welcome to Wikipedia!

edit

Hello, Francsco Carbonara FCarbonara, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Blackout seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 22:21, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

October 2022

edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to List of radio stations in Turin, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 00:33, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

That article was a list. You could have tried to put your radio station in that list, but you didn't. You also tried to add to the Turin article, which was an even worse idea. You might want to have a look at WP:FIRST, and maybe read some more Wikipedia articles to see what we do and what we don't have in such articles. Drmies (talk) 00:37, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Seventh-day Adventist Church, you may be blocked from editing. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 00:55, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 01:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Italian Union of Seventh-day Adventist Christian Churches. You need to stop this. That content you're adding is lousy. It's poor English, it's not properly verified, it's the same sentence twice, and you didn't even bother explaining. Plus you're edit warring of course. Discospinster, please consider blocking if they're doing it again--and note that the IP is also blocked. I do not know what's up with the weird Sardinian IP that follows these edits; it's not this editor. Drmies (talk) 01:11, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Drmies (talk) 02:12, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Francesco, I am going to give you this last warning. Your edits are not correct. They're faulty. Above I have indicated some of the problems. You are also edit warring, which is a blockable offense. You are not explaining what you are doing in your edits, and you haven't responded to talk page messages, which is a no-no on a collaborative project. You have just been reverted again. If you make the same edits again, I will simply block you per WP:NOTHERE--please click on that link to see what that means. And I can also refer you to WP:CIR--if you keep on making the same malformatted edits (those citations, for instance), then you are either being willfully disruptive or you are not competent to edit here. I could have blocked you earlier, but didn't want to, but this is getting out of hand. Drmies (talk) 02:17, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 02:17, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

If you had been here to build an encyclopedia, you would have a. learned how to do it and b. figured out what the rules of engagement are. Basta. Drmies (talk) 02:18, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply