| EST | This user's time zone is EST. |
 | This user strives to maintain a policy of neutrality on controversial issues. |
|
Thanks for your ideas relating to this article - and welcome to Wikipedia :) I've been wanting to improve the digital forensics articles for a while so it's great to see someone else with enthusiasm for it! I was Bold and implemented some of your suggestions; including creating Digital forensics as an umbrella page for the whole topic. What do you think? Also; don't worry about being new - feel free to dive into editing the articles. I can help out with any issues - and the worst that can happen is we have to revert to an earlier version :) Some pages you might find handy would be... WP:CITE, WP:RS, WP:MOS and WP:V. If you need any help just yell and I will try my best --Errant Tmorton166(Talk) 13:31, 2 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
- Thanks, Errant. That's very kind of you. I'll look over your pages. I also bought a this book to help get me learn more about about Wikipedia and the culture around here. Yes, I think creating Digital Forensics as an umbrella page is a fine idea. The existing Computer Forensics page can then be focused on the computer forensics aspect of the digital forensics world and other pages can fall under that umbrella. Finally, yes, undo is a wonderful thing. If I screw something up too badly, it looks easy enough for someone to correct. :) Ericjhuber (talk) 00:20, 3 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
- Heh, I bought to Casey book on your recommendation BTW (Amazon are awesome... it arrived just now :D) so I am planning to add a short "history" section to Digital forensics now. --Errant Tmorton166(Talk) 09:10, 3 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
- It's a great book and it's perfect reading for someone interested in doing Wikipedia editing in this area. Ericjhuber (talk) 12:27, 6 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
- The network stuff is interesting - I do a lot of pen-testing/anti-forensics on networks but non of the actual forensics stuff. --Errant Tmorton166(Talk) 12:46, 6 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
