User talk:Dutchy85/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

→

Archive 10

Reference Errors on 2 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the F.J. Thwaites page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:46, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Sky Giant

See revisions. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 17:06, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Mates of the Murrumbidgee

I reverted your redirect, because there was no article at the redirect target. If you intended to move the article there, please be aware that cut-and-paste moves are discouraged. Instead, please use the move page method. Sjö (talk) 10:46, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alfred Rolfe (director) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[http://www.austlit.edu.au/austlit/page/A151688?mainTabTemplate=agentDefault Alfred Rolfe]] at [[AustLit]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:43, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Pacific Liner

See revisions. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 14:41, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 15 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the His Only Chance page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help) and a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:46, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Sixth Year

The article The Sixth Year has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable television episode

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Becky Sayles (talk) 16:16, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Merry Merry

To you and yours

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 22:53, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Marc Gracie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marc Gracie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Gracie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Makro (talk) 18:20, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Box Office Story additions

I have questions about this source. Are these numbers cumulative or based on first releases? For The Green Room (film) I had previously added that it sold about 30,000 tickets, based on information from Truffaut's biography. This number is much different from your 161,293 admissions, and would contradict all information that the film was a flop (although it still shows the film as being Truffaut's least profitable). I also reverted the info on Citizen Kane since I was already familiar with the Box Office Story numbers reflecting the 1991 re-release box office.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 21:31, 4 January 2015 (UTC) Hey deoliveriafan - as far as I know the numbers are cumulative... though I could be wrong - the same website lists the film as getting admissions of 66,000 in Paris alone in 1978 - http://translate.google.com/translate?depth=1&hl=en&prev=search&rurl=translate.google.com.au&sl=fr&u=http://www.boxofficestory.com/box-office-francois-truffaut-c25718972 - but it should be said 161 thousand admissions is definitely a flop for a French film. I take your point re: Citizen Kane but could we put some figures in the "gross" item at the box at the top? Dutchy85 (talk) 23:02, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi. I misspoke and was mixing your edits up with someone else who added the 1991 US box office on Kane. The French admissions numbers are still in the article in a section that talks about the films release in France in 1946. As far as The Green Room thanks for the info and I'll expand on it in the article so there's no contradiction between it and the infobox.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 00:16, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Different aspect to the same subject - French box office figures are not really relevant to the gross of American films. I recommend that you remove these figures that you added to infoboxes, so that other editors don't have to. BMK (talk) 11:29, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Ken, I can understand your position but genuinely believe that French box office figures add a fascinating dimension to a page's entry for American films. However I won't press the point and will endeavour to only use it for American films were I can specifically illustrate it. Thanks for your interest Dutchy85 (talk) 11:58, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

The problem is that the French figures don't really tell us anything except how well the film did in France, and specifically don't project into giving us an idea about what the film grossed (either in the US or overall) or whether the film was a B.O. success. Every country has particular tastes, and French taste in film is notoriously at odds with U.S. tastes. So, I would say that the French figures are really only relevant for French films and shouldn't be used for American films unless, as you say, you have additional info to connect it up. BMK (talk) 01:31, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Ken I completely respect that point of view but do feel that wikipedia can be overly US-centric at times and France is one of the biggest cinema markets in the world but agree it should only be used for specific purposes eg to show how internationally popular a Hollywood film is eg The Great Dictator, or how a French-set Hollywood film wasn't popular in France - thanks again for your interest and support Dutchy85 (talk) 01:45, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Womance for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Womance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Womance until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. the wub "?!" 00:07, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Womance

I considered using that Huffington Post source, but I note that it cites Wikipedia as its source, which means this might be happening :) Chris Smowton (talk) 09:45, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alma Brooks

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alma Brooks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 03:09, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Alma Brooks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alma Brooks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alma Brooks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 16:13, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 16 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the George Wallace (Australian comedian) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of La Belle Aventure

Hello Dutchy85,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged La Belle Aventure for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Richard Reinhardt (talk) 08:58, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Diary of a Bachelor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diary of a Bachelor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diary of a Bachelor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:35, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Full approved bio about Katt Shea, director, writer, master teacher

Hi there, I made changes to the bio including links to everything. Hope this helps! Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KattShea (talk • contribs) 23:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of St. Val's Mystery for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article St. Val's Mystery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Val's Mystery until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JustBerry (talk) 02:50, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Fred MacMurray

If you are going to add this reference source, use:

• Tranberg, Charles. Fred MacMurray: A Biography. Albany, Georgia: Bear Manor Media, 2014. ISBN 978-0-8108-2315-0. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 17:24, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Citation formatting

Hi Duchy85 - I've noticed you've added some citations to film articles. This is welcome, but there are some embedded links that aren't right. for example, in The Double Event (1911 film), you've added "newspaper=[[Punch |Punch (Melbourne, Vic. : 1900 - 1918; 1925)]]". This actually links to a disambiguation page. An appropriate link here would be "newspaper=[[Melbourne Punch|Punch]]" - and the rest is not needed because you already have a 'location=Melbourne', and a publication date.

Similarly, on 16 March you added a couple of links in citations to George Wallace (Australian comedian): one was "newspaper=[[Table Talk |Table Talk (Melbourne, Vic. : 1885 - 1939)]]", another was "newspaper=[[News |News (Adelaide, SA : 1923 - 1954)]]". Both of these wikilinks go to the wrong destination; I think what you needed here are "newspaper=[[Table Talk (newspaper)|Table Talk]]" and "newspaper=[[The News (Adelaide)|The News]]".

I also have a question about some other citations. For example, in Something of Value, you've added "<ref>Grace Kelly's Future Blooming; Lana Turner Film Found by Thorpe Schallert, Edwin. Los Angeles Times (1923-Current File) [Los Angeles, Calif] 01 Apr 1955: B11</ref>". What is the meaning of '(1923-Current File)'? And would it be possible to format the citation in the usual manner as "<ref>"Grace Kelly's Future Blooming; Lana Turner Film Found by Thorpe" Schallert, Edwin. ''Los Angeles Times'' 1 April 1955: B11</ref>"? That is: with the article title in quotes, the newspaper italicised, omitting the location when it's already included in the newspaper title, and omitting the leading zero on the date, and not abbreviating the month - and why the embedded line break at the end of the article title? Or even better, to provide the citation information as parameters to the {{cite news}} template, so no manual formatting would be needed.

Colonies Chris (talk) 08:12, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

I see you're still adding junk references like this one in Death Race 2000:

<ref name="la">9 Directors Rising From the Trashes: Nine Directors Rising From the Trashes 9 Directors Rising From the Trashes 9 Directors Rising From the Trashes From the Trashes From the Trashes From the Trashes Thomas, Kevin. Los Angeles Times (1923-Current File) [Los Angeles, Calif] 21 Dec 1975: m1. </ref>

What the hell is going on there? You need to address the concerns I've raised or I will start reverting all such changes. Colonies Chris (talk) 11:01, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Colonies Chris, the citations I used come from one of two sources - Trove, the database for the National Library of Australia, which has a special citation for wikipedia which I use. The other citation I take from proquest, which is a research tool. I take the citations directly from that. Dutchy85 (talk) 11:10, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

• Thank you for your response. I've just gone to Trove and seen the citation it generates for the reference to Melbourne Punch I mentioned, and it is still producing the entirely incorrect wikilinks I described. This needs to be taken up with Trove right away - it's corrupting Wikipedia with a lot of erroneous links. Do you know if they consulted with anyone before supplying these terrible citations?
  

With ProQuest, obviously there's a problem with the cite I mentioned above, and there's a more general problem with the formatting - it's not like anything normally used in Wikipedia, it doesn't fit the style guidelines for citations, and it has this mysterious (1923-current file) component, which appears to have no value whatever. Colonies Chris (talk) 11:40, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

I'm sure if you contacted Trove themselves they'd be able to address it - I was sticking to their formatting because I thought it was the original one. The (1923-current file) type things comes from, I think, the fact sometimes there can be more than one say Los Angeles Times, a Los Angeles Times that ran from 1890-1911 and the one that runs from 1923 to current (I'm making that up as a example - Ijust think that's the reason why) Dutchy85 (talk) 11:49, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for this background. I've discovered that much the same concerns were raised with Trove as recently as March, but with no success. I've just raised these issues again in their forum, so we'll see if that approach has any better luck. There's nothing I can do about ProQuest as I don't have an account. I don't think the (1923-current file) stuff can be to do with the newspaper itself, as citations from other papers, such as the New York Times, also have exactly the same. Colonies Chris (talk) 22:13, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. I noticed that you're updating information in martial arts films. Thanks for finding and adding this data. I made a few tweaks. Generally, we use ranges when there's conflicting data. For example, if one source reports a budget of $1 million, and another source reports $2 million, we'd say $1–2 million, followed by both citations. In the infobox, we generally prefer to list the worldwide gross, so if you find a film that only lists the US gross, you could probably just replace that value with the worldwide gross. If the values for the same data (both US or both worldwide), you should use a range. Also, you should be a bit careful of copying too much directly from sources. It's difficult to avoid that when you're citing a direct quotation, but you shouldn't copy more than necessary. Anyway, thanks for updating these articles. They tend to languish. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:31, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Women in the Wind

Check it out. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 16:10, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you for making Wikipedia a freer and better place to get knowledge! :). In regard to your recent military operations articles.  ' Olowe2011 Talk 00:12, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bring on the Girls (film)

A tag has been placed on Bring on the Girls (film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

A3. No content

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted or to add sufficient content about the film, together with WP:RSs that verify that content. Be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ssilvers (talk) 05:38, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Invitation to join MILHIST

Hello Dutchy85! Thank you for your contributions.

If you would be interested in joining a group of editors dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history, please take a look at the Military history WikiProject—we would be delighted to have you! If you like what you see, please sign your name here, and a project coordinator will soon be along with a formal welcome. Regards, Anotherclown (talk) 21:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

I'm incredibly flattered and very tempted but probably shouldn't join - I get in enough trouble as it is with the time I spend on Wikipedia :) - but am happy to keep contributing to articles. Thanks again - very flattering.Dutchy85 (talk) 22:08, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Elmo De Witt

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Elmo De Witt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Postcard Cathy (talk) 23:43, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 14 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the The Main Attraction (film) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pat Boone may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• metadc19752/m1/ |title=Show 6 – Hail, Hail, Rock 'n' Roll: The rock revolution gets underway. [Part 2&#93; : UNT Digital Library |publisher=Digital.library.unt.edu |date=1969-03-16 |work=[[
• *''A Child is Crying'' based on book by [[John D. MacDonald] with script by Marc Siegel - for Cooga Mooga (1961)<ref>Boone Company Buys '

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:32, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours!

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 04:20, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Substubs

Hi, as you probably noticed on your watchlist, I was going through Australian film stubs and happened upon some created by you that were lacking context. In the future please do try to include more information such as the name of the director, starring actors, general plot, awards, etc. While you added some information to infoboxes, it is pertinent to include it in the prose because infoboxes are only meant as a at-a-glance version of the text itself and are collapsed by default on mobile devices, a huge portion of our readers. It also does a disservice to our readers because they come to Wikipedia expecting to find information on the subjects where in the cases of very small articles they'd be better served by the imdb links at the bottom. Opencooper (talk) 05:32, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Please use 'Edit Summaries'

Suggestion: It would be very helpful, and certainly preferred, if you would add Edit Summaries when editing in Wikipedia. Users editing Wikipedia articles are strongly encouraged to provide accurate and detailed summaries of their edits, and this often helps to avoid reversions or deletions of material added. Thanks. --- Professor JR (talk) 08:14, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

'Unmade Films' section of 'Alan Ladd' article - Suggestion

Hello Dutchy85 --- Your recent contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated.
As you are a frequent editor at Alan Ladd, this is let you know that the 'Unmade Films' section of that article is being considered for Deletion.
If you or other editors believe there is a valid reason for its inclusion in that bio. entry, then you or those editors should add an introductory paragraph at the beginning of the section explaining what it is that the list represents -- that is, explaining what exactly constitutes an "unmade film", so as to warrant a filmography-like list of same in a movie actor's bio. (as opposed to, say, brief mention of certain key roles the actor was considered for, but never got, in the text or body of the article).
Long, official-looking lists of this sort (or "Unmade Filmographies", if you will) -- if truly notable at all, or worthy of inclusion as part of the biographical articles on actors in Wikipedia -- could turn into almost endless listings of all sorts of failed concepts, unmade scripts, cancelled productions, etc., etc.
Thank you. --- Professor JR (talk) 10:32, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alan Ladd may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Los Angeles Times (1923-Current File) [Los Angeles, Calif] 04 May 1957: A8. </ref>)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:03, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 22 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Jeff Chandler (actor) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Request regarding film articles

Hi Dutchy85, and thanks for all the film articles you have been creating. I'd like to remind you that when you create an article, it's important to then wikilink the title of the film in the articles on each of the cast members (and director, etc.) who have Wikipedia articles (assuming the film is mentioned in their article). Control+F is useful in quickly finding out on each article whether the film is mentioned. This wikilinking action helps people know that the article now exists and does not need to be created, and it helps prevent the film article from being an unlinked orphan, and it helps readers who are reading the article on the actor. Thanks again, Softlavender (talk) 00:36, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 29 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the War Arrow page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Jericho Mile. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hot Pork Pie 13:38, 26 January 2016 (UTC) At no stage was my edit disruptive I think you may have gotten me confused with someone else Dutchy85 (talk) 07:46, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

"Box office"

Please remember to use a small "o" in "office", not a capital one. BMK (talk) 17:13, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 27 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the March or Die (film) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Betty Co-Ed

Thank you for your contribution, but your article is extremely short. — Xx236 (talk) 14:28, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mystery Range

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Mystery Range requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2602:306:3357:BA0:74C4:9FE5:6E43:CEE4 (talk) 01:33, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Feud of the Trail

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Feud of the Trail requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2602:306:3357:BA0:74C4:9FE5:6E43:CEE4 (talk) 01:41, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Navigation

When you create a stub with a disambiguated title like Racing Luck (1948 film), please remember to add a hat note (or dab page entry) at the base name to help readers to find it. I've added the hat note at Racing Luck. Thanks. PamD 06:50, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Contextual information

Hi just another friendly reminder: please try to include more contextual information in your articles. Most importantly every film article should include who the director is in the first sentence, as well as the country of origin (if it's simple to determine) of the film. Film titles should also be italicized, and you can do that using {{Infobox film}} or {{Italic title}}. Lastly it would help to add the {{WikiProject film}} template to the talk pages of the articles so they can be tracked and rated. (See the template documentation for the parameters; though for stubs you can assess them as stubs) Lastly you should try to include links to the newly created articles. Happy editing. Opencooper (talk) 12:33, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Very short articles

As an experienced editor, why do you create articles like this, this and this with no categories, incorrectly formatted refs & external links and no other information (director, cast, infobox, etc)? Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 11:59, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

I've tried to talk to this editor before about the context problem and just now again before I saw your message. It really doesn't take that long to get the director and cast from IMDB (which they also link), and while infoboxes aren't required they're pretty standard on film articles and don't take that long either. I encourage Dutchy85 to take more time with each article, preferring quality over quantity, (what use is a film article if it hardly gives any information?) and to use the preview button to make sure there aren't any errors in their articles. Opencooper (talk) 12:45, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks OC. I know that Dutchy has been working on articles linked to Sam Katzman (as have I), and I create short articles, but they do have the basics, such as this one, for example. Compare my initial creation to those of Dutchy's, above. Dutchy - more than happy for you to use my base article as a template when you're creating new film articles. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 13:00, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Yeah other than the thing about context they have the basic structure down such as by including appropriate links. Dutchy85, your articles are very much appreciated so please don't take my advice the wrong way, I'm just trying to help you create better articles and I'll try to help as I can such as I did at I Surrender Dear (1948 film). (I even created I Surrender Dear (disambiguation) for it) I'd be more than happy to lead you to appropriate resources for things like syntax or manuals of style so please don't hesitate to ask. Opencooper (talk) 14:04, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Despite multiple editors pointing this out to you on your talkpage, you've just created this. Do you see what issues this is to create a stub like this without categories, etc? Please reply here to indicate you've read these issues and understand what is going on. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 09:57, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 19 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Arch of Triumph (1948 film) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Adding references

Thanks for the efforts you're putting in on several articles, adding pieces of information. Quick thing, when adding a reference, can you please not simply put a raw link, or an incomplete reference. You can check out proper formatting styles at WP:CIT. When you add a fact, and reference a book for example, please include a page number. Again, thanks for your efforts. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:35, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Referencing

Could you please learn how to make references properly? Every time you add a reference to an article on my watchlist I have to fix it, and I'm getting a little tired of it. Please see WP:REFERENCES. Thanks. BMK (talk) 23:36, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Here are some very simple examples --

Periodicals: <ref>Author(s), last name first, or "Staff" if unidentified (date of publication) [URL "Name of article"] ''[[Name of periodical]]'' page(s)</ref>

Books: <ref>Author(s) last name first (date of publication) [URL if from Google Books, etc. ''Title of Book''] Place of publication: Publisher. page(s). ISBN number</ref>

or you can use the various citation templates. BMK (talk) 00:56, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tough Assignment (documentary)

The article Tough Assignment (documentary) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This film exists, yes. But I see nothing to make it Notable. It's not included in the Filmography in Ken G. Hall. It's been put into the template, so will have a heap of incoming links, but to what? Neither source gives any more information than the existence, and documentary nature, of this film. A redirect to a fuller Filmography, whether as part of the man's article or as a standalone, would be more useful.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 12:36, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Talk:The Time is Not Yet Ripe

I invite you to ongoing RM discussion. --George Ho (talk) 02:34, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mark Thomas McGee

The article Mark Thomas McGee has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Strongjam (talk) 14:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

100 Rifles

Plot sections need to be written by us, not copied from elsewhere online. Plot descriptions (even those published by official sources) are copyright, and you can't copy them here. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 23:46, 6 April 2016 (UTC)