Dumboldboy
Welcome!
|
Reference errors on 2 November
editHello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Piedmont (train) page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Excellent example of alternate footnote style
edithttps://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Jessica_Hamby&action=edit Dumboldboy (talk) 15:23, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
editHi Dumboldboy! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editHelp me!
editThis help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hi all, I vaguely remember editing sections with references that were defined outside said section and being able to include a line or two of code in the preview to pull in the extra-section references. Does this ring a bell with anyone? Thanks!!!
Dumboldboy (talk) 04:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- Unless that line of code contained definitions for the named references used in the section, there's no way that could work (as I understand the current software). But it's possible that something like you remember used to work (I haven't been here all that long) or perhaps works with one of the other editors. The always-available workaround, of course, is to simply edit the entire page rather than just a section, if the undefined named references are causing a problem. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 05:01, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- According to Help:Footnotes#Previewing edits, there are some other tools that may be helpful – I've not used them, though. This one, at User:Anomie/ajaxpreview.js definitely claims to be able to render the other named references. I don't see any sign that you employed any of these userscripts in the past, but it might be worth a try. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 05:14, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
editArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)