Banned Forever?

edit

You guys really don't want me editing on Wikipedia anymore, do you? --DukeyDukeyToo (talk) 04:03, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Chibi Tiny Tales moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for creating Chibi Tiny Tales. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. echidnaLives - talk - edits 05:15, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Chibi Tiny Tales

edit

  Hello, DukeyDukeyToo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chibi Tiny Tales, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 19 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Chibi Tiny Tales

edit
 

Hello, DukeyDukeyToo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chibi Tiny Tales".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

December 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Patient Zero. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Coyote vs. Acme, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Patient Zerotalk 18:33, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Patient Zero
I believed I did so in that tea page. DukeyDukeyToo (talk) 21:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi - do you mean the Teahouse? That's great - now all that's needed for you to do is add it to the article. I imagine someone at the Teahouse will help you out in due course, but for the future, do take a look at Help:Referencing for beginners. Please let me know if you have any further questions, and happy editing! Patient Zerotalk 21:45, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Patient Zero
Can you add it in there instead? Everytime I try to do something, I get heavily and negatively criticized for it. DukeyDukeyToo (talk) 23:05, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Mike Allen is being a big jerk!

edit

All we are trying to do is include info regarding the movie and he's being a big jerk about it! --DukeyDukeyToo (talk) 00:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Are you a child? Do you have the WP:COMPETENCE to edit here? Keep this up and you will be reported. Mike Allen 01:16, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
I am 36 years old and I know how to read, bub! You're the one who's causing trouble just by removing the responses when we know what's going on over on Twitter/X! DukeyDukeyToo (talk) 02:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedia is not a platform for conducting a campaign, and not a summary of twitter-drama. And name calling will only result in your editing privileges being removed. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 10:53, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

March 2024

edit

  Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Coyote vs. Acme ‎. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Mike Allen 01:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

June 2024

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as Talk:WPXI are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 18:17, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:DukeyDukeyDoo per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DukeyDukeyDoo. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 12:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DukeyDukeyToo (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Do you guys really want me blocked from Wikipedia forever? DukeyDukeyToo (talk) 18:45, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you:
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:46, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.