Dtunkelang
how can we reap the benefits of this attention economy?
FYI [1] Yakushima (talk) 12:19, 4 September 2011 (UTC) Thanks for the fyi. I've removed the POV material. Dtunkelang (talk) 15:23, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Impersonation
editI have blocked the account Daniel Tunkelang (talk · contribs) as an impersonation. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:46, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you! Dtunkelang (talk) 00:58, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
- I also speedy-deleted the article in accordance with WP:CSD#G5, since the impersonator seemed to be a sockpuppet of the blocked account Gulf Ventures (talk · contribs). ~Amatulić (talk) 01:01, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Please join discussion about Structured Search
editHi Daniel. I would like to invite you to join the discussion about Structured search. You will have a lot of fun. Your colleague. Kandreyev (talk) 06:47, 31 October 2014 (UTC)kandreyev
- In connection with this, I have drawn Kandreyev's attention to Wikipedia:Canvassing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:27, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
DJ Patil date of birth
editWhat is your source for DJ Patil's date of birth (May 17, 1979)? Vaqab (talk) 01:28, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
This article says Patil is 45 years old which would make his year of birth something like 1970. Vaqab (talk) 01:29, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
A January 2012 article said he was 37. Vaqab (talk) 01:38, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
My source was Crunchbase. But questioning that now that I see bday messages to him on Twitter dated August 3rd (this and this). So at least I'm quite sure the date is wrong, if not the year. Given that I know him pretty well, I should just ask him. :-) Dtunkelang (talk) 01:44, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Lyra Health
editHello, Dtunkelang,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Lyra Health should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyra Health .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks, --Anarchyte 04:27, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Sorry if I was confused. I thought your retracting the AFD meant that there was no longer anyone advocating that the article be deleted. -- Dtunkelang (talk)
June 2015
editYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Removing AfD template
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Lyra Health. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:10, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Reply to e-mail
editResponding here in the interests of openness. Note that I did not "revert the speedy keep". I added a couple of maintenance templates as any user is entitled to do. Further discussion on the talk page.--ukexpat (talk) 13:06, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
editThis message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding Lyra Health. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 13:18, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Lyra Health
editPer the conflict of interest guidelines, the Terms of Use and your own disclosure, I have moved your article to Draft:Lyra Health. You can work on it there and submit it for review once you're done by an unconnected contributor. Please review the inclusion guidelines for corporations to make sure this topic meets them. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:30, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Lyra Health Logo.png
editThanks for uploading File:Lyra Health Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Lyra Health concern
editHi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lyra Health, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:56, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Lyra Health
editHello, Dtunkelang. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Lyra Health".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 08:45, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Dtunkelang. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Trumped-Up-Cards.jpg listed for discussion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Trumped-Up-Cards.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:29, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Dtunkelang. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Dtunkelang. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Dtunkelang. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editNomination of List of enterprise search vendors for deletion
editThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of enterprise search vendors until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.