Docolusanya

March 2015

Hello, I'm PhantomTech. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Goodluck Jonathan, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. PhantomTech (talk) 18:32, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Moving articles to user talk namespace

Please do not move articles to the user talk namespace again, as you have done to List of demonyms for states in Nigeria. Your move of that article has now been reverted. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 02:28, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Cleveland Indians

I am sorry that I do not understand your question on my talk page. It is straightforward in asking me whether I have the authority to revert blocks but you have not been blocked and I certainly hope that you will not be editing in a way that would get you blocked in the future. Also, I did not revert your edit with respect to Cleveland Indians so I assume you are not asking about reverting edits (or reverting or rolling back a reversion). I do have reviewer and rollbacker privileges. Donner60 (talk) 01:42, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Hello, I'm AJFU. I noticed that you made a change to an article, United States presidential election, 2020, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  AJFU  23:28, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at United States presidential election, 2020. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. clpo13_(talk) 00:14, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Hello. I noticed that you attempted to file a deletion discussion on the article Mordad but did not complete the process. Please note that, when listing an article for deletion, a discussion page needs to be made for other users to discuss whether to keep or delete the article. This is typically done by following the steps listed here. Note that if you are editing as an unregistered user, you cannot create a discussion page. Please consider registering an account or asking another user to help you complete the process at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion. Thank you. clpo13_(talk) 23:24, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 17 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Corruption in Canada page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Canadian federal elections

You have reverted two times as of now. Both interim leaders remain. Please stop removing them. If you revert once more, you are at WP:3RR. Take your concerns on the talk page and stop reverting. It's disruptive. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 16:44, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Dave Khan photo

Hi Docolusanya, just wondering if you received permission from Khan or the party to upload File:Dave Khan.jpg? Non-free images of living persons are considered violations of WP:NFC#UUI. Thanks, Madg2011 (talk) 19:10, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi Magd2011! Thank you for your concern, but I have personally received permission from Khan. Docolusanya (talk) 19:48, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, that's great. Would you be able to get him to complete a Declaration of Consent and send it to OTRS? This way we can verify that permission has been given from the source; and he can better understand what he's releasing the photo for (eg. many people don't realize that hosting a photo on Wikimedia requires consent for commercial reuse). Madg2011 (talk) 20:23, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ninth generation of video game consoles (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Decker was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ninth generation of video game consoles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

joe decker^talk 23:15, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Docolusanya, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! joe deckertalk 23:15, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to 2017 Unite the Right rally, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:33, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi Muboshgu. As I have stated, that was a mistake, and I apologize, but I had reverted the edit before you had sent this message.

Alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

— Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 05:15, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

Hello, I'm Flix11. I want to let you know that your contribution on 2018–19 Premier League was not constructive and considered as vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. – Flix11 (talk) 01:45, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: British Poles (January 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:British Poles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:British Poles, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 16:35, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:British Poles

Hello, Docolusanya. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:British Poles, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:British Poles

Hello, Docolusanya. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "British Poles".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:44, 5 July 2021 (UTC)