Welcome

edit
Hello, Deguef! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\Work 19:57, 28 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

July 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Italy, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Goochelaar (talk) 21:37, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Request

edit

Could you, please, confirm whether the source (I assume you have it; correct me if I am mistaken, pls) mentions the words "ethnic cleansing". [1] Thank you very much. From my personal experience, WP places a lot of importance on citations, effectively delegating the responsibility for any content to the sources. Dc76\talk 14:50, 3 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


Answer

The source refers specifically to the exodus of ethnic Italians. If the ethnic structure of the inhabitants of a territory is overturned by force, then it is ethnic cleansing. Ethnic cleansing does not mean necessarily genocide and certainly I would not use in this case the term "genocide" as I woud do, instead, in the case of Armenians in Anatolia. I would not use the term genocide for Srebrenica, but only massacre in a framework of a policy of ethnic cleansing. This source as well as other Italian sources do mention the words "ethnic cleansing" for the exodus of Italians. Even the President of the Republic of Italy Giorgio Napolitano made use of this term (pulizia etnica) in his official speaches for the day of the memory on 10th February 2007 and on 10th February 2008. However, governments of Croatia and Slovenia dont accept these words. According to these governments, murders of "foibe" and exodus involved as victims of communist guerilla not only ethnic Italians, but also thousands of non-communist ethnic Croatians and Slovenians --Deguef (talk) 18:03, 3 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:55, 11 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

propaganda

edit

purtroppo questo sito è utilizzato da gentaglia che vuole fare solo propaganda: conosci i fanatici user:DIREKTOR e user:AlasdairGreen27 che forse sono lo stesso tizio ma queste utenze continuano a far danni. T'invito a controllare foibe massacres e Istrian exodus: potresti annullare questo ennesimo vandalismo del famigerato slavo. Te lo chiedo perchè tu non puoi esser accusato di utenza clone, difatti tale slavo accusa tutti coloro che si oppongono alla sua agenda politica di esser cloni: ha avuto molti blocchi quindi, se insiste a imporre propaganda ultra nazionalista croata, puoi segnalarlo in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents dove è già stato ben descritto numerose volte. Ossequi,--MILAZERO (talk) 10:34, 25 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Italian economists

edit

You said "Other most relevant Italian economists should be added to the list" - that is, the category for Italian economists.

Wikipedia category pages aren't meant to be all-inclusive. Rather, they indicate all the pages that have the relevant category tag (in this case, [[category:Italian economists]]). If an article doesn't exist, or it exists but doesn't contain that category tag, then it won't be included in the category. Fortunately, this is easy to fix: just edit the article (you may need to create it first!) and add the category tag at the end.

Good luck. DS (talk) 13:29, 15 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

evidenza

edit

professore carissimo, qui non poche persone vogliono occultare l'evidenza facendo vandalismo ma osano accusare di vandalismo persino chi aggiunge fonti ufficiali del parlamento italiano! Per onestà intellettuale le chiedo di ripristinare tale contributo: l'unione fà la forza! Questo progetto richiede molta pazienza. Alla prossima e auguri di tante belle cose —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.206.126.34 (talk) 14:28, 11 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

ho comunicato e denunciato: User talk:Jimbo Wales#Persistent harassment against Italian users; professore, si unisce a noi?--MILAZERO (talk) 15:10, 13 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Mi scuso, ma sono poco pratico di Wikipedia. Non conosco i regolamenti. Mi sono accorto che diverse voci alle quali avevo apportato correzioni o arricchimenti hanno poi subito vandalismo. Presumo siano opera di slavi o di loro fiancheggiatori. Strano adirsi, ma le notizie che riguardano la Germania sono più rispettate. Ritengo che la vicenda delle foibe sia stata indubbiamente una pulizia etnica. Sono invece molto pi guardingo nell'uso del termine genocidio di cui oggi anche in sede ONU si abusa. Userei genocidio per gli armeni di Turchia, per gli ebrei e per i tutsi del Ruanda, ma certo non per il Kosovo, per Sebrenica, per Marzabotto, per Katyn o per Fantana Alba. Genocidio a mio avviso significa la pianificazione dello sterminio di un popolo. Attendo istruzioni.--Deguef (talk) 19:40, 13 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

condivido le tue opinioni ma il problema è che certi amministratori sono totalmente ignoranti riguardo le pulizie etniche ordinate da Broz Tito dopo la seconda guerra mondiale quindi mettono al bando tutte le utenze che insistono su tali argomenti: oltre italiani, furono massacrati pure tedeschi e ungheresi. Potresti inserire fonti riguardo la pulizia etnica in foibe massacres e National Memorial Day of the Exiles and Foibe poi vediamo se i soliti idioti vandalizzeranno ancora. Ciao —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.206.126.34 (talk) 11:26, 21 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

un utente croato vandalizza ossessivamente l'articolo riguardante Broz Tito eliminando tutte le fonti che denunciano i crimini del dittatore. Dopo tanti blocchi persevera nella sua agenda politica e di propaganda attaccando particolarmente utenze italiane con la complicità di alcuni amministratori! Il suo tipo di propaganda è ossessivo e distruttivo: rimuove sempre le fonti contro la sua agenda politica; nell'articolo su Broz Tito rimuove ogni riferimento alle foibe e a qualsiasi crimine compiuto dal dèspota slavo:

[2]

[3]

[4]

Potresti intervenire? Questa persona opera nello stesso modo in tutti gli articoli riguardanti la ex Iugoslavia! Ciao,--Mengardo (talk) 12:47, 8 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ripeto, non sono esperto di Wikipedia e non so come muovermi. Effettivamente ho notato ci sono ingerenze e vandalismi inconcepibili per Wikipedia. Evidentemente o le regole sono troppo lasche o gli amministratori sono di parte. Comunque gli effetti per Wikipedia sono negativi. Ma questo DIREKTOR, che si considera un'autorità, è veramente tale? Deguef

ma davvero hai ancora un dubbio su quell'imbecille?--Mengardo (talk) 06:23, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited Battle of Lissa (1866), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 23 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited Paolo Savona, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bank of Italy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

March 2012

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article C. A. Rosetti, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. RashersTierney (talk) 11:01, 30 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited Third Italian War of Independence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 6 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited Giordano Dell'Amore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Indiana University (Bloomington) people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bank of Italy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 6 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Italian irredentism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ladin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 10 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply