Davidmiller676
Your message on my talkpage
editHelp with changes
editI noticed you deleted my work on the entry, "Due Diligence." I am new to Wikipedia, and this is my first entry, so I am not entirely sure what all the reasons are, but I would like to learn what mistakes I may have made. I think one of your issues is sourcing. I do know the source information, but am not sure how to put this into the entry correctly.
The old Due Diligence entry is out of date, and needs to be updated. Please tell me how to fix whatever mistakes I may have made, so that I can properly correct the entry for Due Diligence.
Thank you in advance for your help on this.
Davidmiller676 (talk) 19:27, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- The reason is that the new definition of due diligence which you added is not supported by any sources, while you did remove the only source which supported the old definition. Further, in your analysis which you added to the article, you reached conclusions without citing a reliable source which could verify these conclusions, for instance your assertions about Lao Tzu, Confucius, Menander etc. If you already have the sources needed to support your additions to the article, you can try the instructions on how to quote sources at WP:CITE. Sourcing with citations also includes any conclusions or comparisons which are added to the article, not only the facts. Without sourcing, the conclusions are considered original research WP:OR. For any further discussion I think this discussion should move to the article talkpage at Talk:Due diligence so that other interested editors can also participate. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 20:24, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Your article has been moved to AfC space
editHi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Davidmiller676/Association of Due Diligence Professionals has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Association of Due Diligence Professionals, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 04:44, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
edit{{subst:submit}}
to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Hazard-SJ ± 07:42, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Association of Due Diligence Professionals, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:43, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Your article submission Association of Due Diligence Professionals
editHello Davidmiller676. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Association of Due Diligence Professionals.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Association of Due Diligence Professionals}}
, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 25 September 2013 (UTC)