October 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm Donner60. Your recent edit to the page Chow Chow appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 01:58, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cross-linked polyethylene with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 02:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cross-linked polyethylene, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Cross-linked polyethylene was changed by Davidabbott9011 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851696 on 2015-10-12T02:03:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:03, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Moons of Saturn.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Moons of Saturn was changed by Davidabbott9011 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956843 on 2015-10-12T03:08:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:08, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Donner60, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Donner60 (talk) 03:30, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I did not use the word "plaigirism", but your edits are vandalism. You changed "Cross-linked polyethylene" to "polypie thing." You added by "David Abbot" to this sentence "Almost all PEX used for pipe and tubing is made by David Abbot." You later added pictures of prairie dogs to the page. Your bogus entry on my user talk page is vandalism. Donner60 (talk) 03:30, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf(talk) 17:45, 13 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Davidabbott9011 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

because John Cena

Decline reason:

No. Making a spurious unblock request again will result in revocation of your talk page access. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:46, 13 October 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.