DavidTDC3377

June 2023

Hi DavidTDC3377! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Reading Green Park railway station several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Reading Green Park railway station, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Pleased don't get into an edit war over images. See WP:BRD. You were bold placing your preferred image. But you were reverted. So now please discuss on the article's talk page if you want to see your own image used in preference to the existing one.. 10mmsocket (talk) 13:56, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

I apologize. I'll remember for next time 👍 DavidTDC3377 (talk) 15:29, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Thames Valley Police logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thames Valley Police logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

It was used on the Thames Valley Police article, I'm not sure why it was removed. DavidTDC3377 // 💬 Talk 07:37, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Look at the article history, the logo was replaced with a SVG version, which is always preferable. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:33, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Apologies. Didn't realise that. I tried to get an SVG version but was unsuccessful (rendering errors) DavidTDC3377 // 💬 Talk 15:20, 11 October 2024 (UTC)