User talk:DavidDelaune/Archive/2021/February

Latest comment: 4 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message


Nomination of Neal Landing, Louisiana for deletion

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neal Landing, Louisiana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neal Landing, Louisiana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reywas92Talk 19:13, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

TonyBallioni (talk) 15:00, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Approval of edit to Seven (film)

Did you happen to notice the edit summary of the change to Seven (film) article that you approved? I'm not looking for a fight with the IP, but I'm not sure that particular edit is a net improvement. — UncleBubba T @ C ) 03:40, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

No, I did not look at the edit summary to notice that you were in an edit war with an IP editor. I actually looked at the content and saw that it was mostly grammar changes and approved it. I don't really see anything wrong with the edit but feel free to undo it if you are strongly opposed to the change. DavidDelaune (talk) 03:53, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
I have decided to revoke the acceptance based on the users comments. DavidDelaune (talk) 04:08, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks! I don't think I'd characterize it as an "edit war", because I make it a point not to do multiple reverts of the same thing. I rejected the pending change because of WP:TOOMUCH. It's been my experience that folks sometimes add so much detail to plot descriptions they begin to look like screenplay transcripts. What started out as a minor content disagreement changed tone when he started posting abusive edit summaries and talk-page messages. Sorry for all the drama, but I wanted to let you know why I said anything to you at all—this is one of those "weird ones". Cheers! — UncleBubba T @ C ) 15:54, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)