User talk:Cyrus noto3at bulaga/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

→

Archive 8

Up to 18 discussions. Archive 1: noto3at

Re: Proposal to be admin on my profile

Re your message: I see that you are making a lot of edits on Wikipedia in the short time you have been here, but it is too early for you to consider becoming on admin. You have only been an editor for a couple of months so do not yet have the experience necessary for you to pass an RfA. I recommend that you keep learning, editing, and watching experienced editors. You do not need to be an admin to do good work on Wikipedia. Perhaps later when you have enough experience in the admin area that you are interested in you will pass an RfA. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:33, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Hoy dominador Tiendo Fishda (talk) 17:48, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Wha

Are you using a bot or why did your reversion summary include the "Report False Positive?"

I remind you that:

1- Sandbox is not a normal page, so i think you shouldn't have reverted my edits for "vandalism" (though if you wanted to test reversion buttons no problem)

2- There are bots that clear the sandbox, no need to do that manually

--TheDasherLegendXD (talk) 12:26, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Re: My user sandbox..... DO WHAT?!

Why did you revert my personal user sandbox? And what is the "it" you are referring to?--Nk3play2 ^{my buzz} 07:10, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

seems that this user doesn't have a good english i guess he meant something else. --TheDasherLegendXD (talk) 12:26, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

@TheDasherLegendXD: doesn't have a good english also isn't correct english xD. WikiPancake 🥞 03:14, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Per WP:BLANKING, IPs are allowed to blank their own talk pages. KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 12:42, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Cyrus_noto3at_bulaga reported by User:KGirlTrucker81 (Result: ). Thank you. KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 12:48, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

You've been warned per the closure of the edit warring report. Edit warring on a talk page is still considered edit warring and the 3RR rule applies there. In general, you should not be restoring your own messages to another user's talk, if that person has removed them. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:23, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Restoring removed talk page content

You were just warned this past weekend about reverting other editors' changes to their own talk pages, specifically their removal of warning templates, and you have just done so again. Care to explain? General Ization ^Talk 02:52, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your recent Requests for new languages on Meta

I have left you a message on this subject on your Meta user talk page. Thanks. StevenJ81 (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Izogamija

Hi. Please use G7 one author request for deletion not A3 no content when an author has blanked a page they have created. This applies when there is no content addition by any others - typo correction, tidying up, categories and tagging do not count as content. This can make a difference when an article is remade more than once later on, and a decision is made as to whether to protect it from creation or not. Peridon (talk) 11:48, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Mr. O Band

Did you really mean to tag it for speedy deletion as WP:A5? Robert McClenon (talk) 03:41, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Robert McClenon, it is Spanish. --cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵɜat bʉɭagɑ!!! (Talk | Contributions) 03:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

I know. Having read the definition of WP:A5, it doesn't appear to apply to foreign-language articles as such, regardless of whether they are in another Wikipedia. There is a different procedure for articles in foreign languages that are tagged as needing translation. A5 would apply if the article had already been moved to the Spanish Wikipedia. Perhaps we should continue this discussion at the speedy deletion talk page. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Regarding your signature

I'm sorry to have to bring this up, but could you please make your signature less of an eyesore? Yellow text on a white background doesn't mix well, and it's actually kind of hard to see your username in that yellow text. SkyWarrior 04:01, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Notability and patrolling

Neither of the two notability tangs you placed on Sekta were correct. It had a sentence of content, and it also has context--it was about a particular village. And with respect to V Prabhakar Chowdary, all members of a legislature are considered notable. Please be more careful, because the unjustified placement of deletion tags on articles discourages new editors. You need to review WP:CSD before placing more tags on new articles. DGG ( talk ) 10:13, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Clearclean

Hi. Be careful, with new articles, not to include promotional wording. There is an NPOV tutorial available if you have difficulty with this.Deb (talk) 10:48, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

@Deb:, it is from the Japanese Wikipedia, because it is not created to English Wikipedia.

Speedy deletion declined: Zack Alford

Hello Cyrus noto3at bulaga. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Zack Alford, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: working with a notable musician in a professional capacity indicates significance. Thank you. SoWhy 11:36, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

Hello, I'm NatGertler. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Sculptor (comics) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Nat Gertler (talk) 03:07, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

I'm sorry

I'm confused. I try to write as politely as possible. Could you help me with writing my question so that it can not be misinterpretated? Kindly.

Edit: I just try to follow the Wikipedia guideline https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_warring

I just want to resolve my problem with https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User_talk:Materialscientist about the edit, nothing more.88.115.74.89 (talk) 12:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)V

A1 on List of Adventist schools in the Philippines

I have removed the WP:A1 speedy deletion tag from this article, because the context is clear: it is a list about Adventist schools in the Philippines. Like the other users who have commented on your talk page, I want to encourage you to read WP:CSD to make sure you understand the criteria before tagging articles. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:33, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Central Bicolano Wikipedia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Central Bicolano Wikipedia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JTtheOG (talk) 04:28, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Pangsinanese Wikipedia) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Pangsinanese Wikipedia, Cyrus noto3at bulaga!

Wikipedia editor Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

No administrators! That must be fun ;) cheers

To reply, leave a comment on Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

— O Fortuna! Imperatrix mundi. 10:22, 16 March 2017 (UTC)