Cyberman

Leave a Message (2011)

Is this Linux Man? You know who this is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.144.186.52 (talk) 00:54, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

I'm a Linux user and forum member on linuxquestions (Cyberman), but otherwise, I don't know who you are. --Cyberman (talk) 12:51, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Action potential

Why did you blank the entire article? Looie496 (talk) 18:12, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Accident? --Cyberman (talk) 17:37, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Past messages

Past messages (before 2010)

You asked about Sun Tzu's battles. NO, there was none. Because he did not exist. Please see my post on "talk" page under "History created Myth, Myth became History".

Past messages (2007)

Hi, I've proposed the article social engineering (psychology) for deletion since it doesn't even come close to Wikipedia's quality standards -- it's a poorly structured, unreferenced mess. If you object to the deletion, please note so on the discussion page, and I will propose a full AFD discussion.--Eloquence* 05:38, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

I have removed your comment, "This guy is funny/witty," at Talk:Seung-Hui Cho as it does not have anything to do with improving the article and is your own analysis and speculation. Phony Saint 00:18, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Are you saying it didn't have any justification or premises for improvement? Do you even understand the etymology of improvement, my dear friend? Shut up and go away. --Cyberman 00:27, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

According to the top of the talk page, "This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Seung-Hui Cho article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject." There was no such improvement, it was an analysis by your own admission. Phony Saint 00:29, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

That's your analysis, not a moderators. --Cyberman 00:30, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

You're free to bring it up with someone else if you must, but I would suggest being a bit more polite with them. Phony Saint 00:38, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Someone replied to your comment on Raffi (poet)[1] :) --VartanM 03:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Apv antagonized NMDAR.PNG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Apv antagonized NMDAR.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 00:09, 2 November 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:09, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

You're a fucking idiot. Taking down my image means taking down the other images that use an alteration of the presented molecule in that article. And there are altered images around Wikipedia of which you did not take down. Bitch, I wish I met you in person so I could smack some sense into you. --Cyberman (talk) 05:16, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Cyberman. You have new messages at Talk:Victim playing.
Message added 08:44, 31 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Lova Falk talk 08:44, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cyberman. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Cyberman. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)