April 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edits you made to Thor (film), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:46, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for engaging in discussion. I readded the word "some" before "white supremacists". Some of your other edits however did not appear to be constructive (Overly detailed and unknown character discriptions, pedantic edits and changing direct quotes). --TriiipleThreat (talk) 16:01, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Jacob Black

edit

Hi. Please remember to use edit summaries especially when removing large sections of text. Otherwise, intent can be confusing to other editors. Thanks. Taroaldo (talk) 23:19, 9 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks User:Taroaldo. Will do. Conficutus (talk) 06:47, 10 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Re: Uncivility on Thor

edit

Just wanted to say that I do not think that I have been acting uncivily. If you are regard my comments in discussion as personal attacks, please be assured that they are not. I do recognize your edits to be in good faith and you (as do I) want what is best for the article. We just disagree on what the best is.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:51, 20 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Replacement on Thor #Idris Elba

edit

Obviously we need something that will replace this deleted content, so I was thinking the following:

  • "It's an extraordinary visual spectacular," says Elba. "It's different from anything else I've done; but at the same time, it's been pointed out to me that here I am playing a central, solid figure again – the one that people should trust. [1] I feel very proud of being part of that movie." [2]

This would bring the section back in to line with Wikipedia standards: KN→ talkcontribs 12:37, 21 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I responded this comment on the Thor talk so that it might receive wider attention and input, I hope that you don't mind.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:32, 22 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Disruptive editing is a mighty big charge. I would be glad to have any admin look at the following quote and render an opinion as to whether it's non-notable fluff:

Just the bigness of the show. It’s so epic, these huge sets were just amazing to look at. And they really pat [sic] attention to detail. When you read the comics, you see all the drawings, and to actually see them in real life, it’s like, “Whoa!” ... I’m sure I’ll be back in something cool.

"It's like, 'Whoa!'"? Surely you can see that that's really not of encyclopedic significance. The one piece of solid information is that Elba has a four-picture deal with Marvel Studios.--Tenebrae (talk) 23:18, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
No, he refers to the set , he refers to how the comics compare to the film and his "Whoa" is a reaction. It's his reaction which is all part of WP:FILMCAST. Further, you deleted all of this including the mention of the four-picture deal which makes your intentions here seem rather vague and at the least, questionable. KN→ talkcontribs 23:27, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Actually, my post above agrees with you that the four-picture deal is notable and should be in. It certainly doesn't need a quote by him, though.--Tenebrae (talk) 23:29, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Please see Thor (film) talk page. Also my latest contribution: [3] KN→ talkcontribs 23:52, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of User:Conficutus/html

edit

User:Conficutus/html, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Conficutus/html and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Conficutus/html during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Lmatt (talk) 20:26, 29 December 2011 (UTC)Reply