CompRhetoric

Squacket ball

FYI, I've added squacketball for deletion here: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Squacketball#.5B.5BSquacketball.5D.5D Archer3 16:08, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: Whom/who

Ha, I wondered if anyone would notice or care. Thanks for the message. :) Teke ^(talk) 01:33, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: more thanks

You're very welcome. There are a lot of bored and not clever people out there vandalising. Glad I could help clear some of it from your user page :-) Will (aka Wimt) 17:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

TGV

I've reworded it to show no deaths over 161kph. Simply south 14:47, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

In the discussion i have put the number of fatalities Simply south 15:00, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Bolonkins

Thank goodness you have come in and acted firmly over BKruglyak and his Bolonkin postings. I was beginning to get very frustrated over the way people were pussy-footing about in the AfD. I saw your strange remark I don't have the macros to do so. The "macro" is {{db|copyvio - see User talk:BKruglyak#Copyright Violations}}. Now you have it. But don't bother to use it - I will delete the remaining images shortly without them being tagged. -- RHaworth 19:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

• Yes, that was a big, cheesey mess. I hope that Alexander Bolonkin's poster will try again since most people seemed to think the information was worthwhile (even though, as you pointed out, it was blatant plagiarism). CompRhetoric 20:08, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

The AfD did seem to heading towards a "weak keep" decision and I find that disappointing. After all the discussion about original research, the real question was dodged: are Bolonkin's ideas actually notable or is he just a good self-publicist? Finding his stuff on the NASA website does not alter my view very much! If you are helping BKruglyak, do stress the importance of notability. -- RHaworth 03:00, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

They are back with Circle Launcher and Space Keeper. -- RHaworth 07:45, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

OSC

Yeah, I got the username from Valentine haha. It's my duty to better the "nets" with Wiki RAmen, Demosthenes 00:04, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Harmonix article

Please be aware that I actually paraphrased much of the CNN interview - it wasn't a copy&paste job, and I had to incorporate that history with the existing page (fortunately it was all consistent). It just was a lot more details that the article didn't have that were cited. --MASEM (t) 21:37, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

TEP edit.

No war. The last edit you reverted was sourced properly. Editor TEPs4justice obviously has an agenda, but seemed willing to work within the guidelines. I think it's ok now. We'll see if it reoccurs. Thanks for the help, it's appreciated. Regards, --Manway (talk) 17:38, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, CompRhetoric. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CompRhetoric. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CompRhetoric. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)