This User is academicaly busy,so he may not respond you immediately,but feel free to contact.

Welcome to Wikipedia Your creation at 10:20, 2 October 2009 of this page included a reference name, <ref name="ww4report.com"/>, that is causing a cite error. Can you go back and fix the error? 75.69.0.58 (talk) 08:11, 3 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

its not all about number

edit

Raqib nizami (talk) 21:18, 6 January 2012 (UTC)i totally agree what you said.Also i would like to add that they agree and have no objection to criticize our holy Prophet(pbuh)!! but they refuse to do so for mhanmmad bin aw!i thing they get fund/donation to do so!!But brother always remember From the early time of Islam we were very few Rasulillah(pbuh) fought battles and won it thought it was 10:100!Now we live in the world of fitna akheri zamana!now the ratio is 72:1!we are very little in num. it will be like this till qiamat exept during the time of imam Mahdi ruling this world.So let us stick together against this fitnatul Wahhabiya Dajjaliya and take part in this battle field of Editing fitna.Where each step is like doing jihad against evil.This is the teaching Imam Hussain Taught us by sacrificing his life.We cant dishonor them just by stepping aside and keep silent.dont worry the victory will be ours.Allah says-'Verily, We have given you (O Muhammad SAW) a manifest victory.That Allah may forgive you your sins of the past and the future[], and complete His Favor on you, and guide you on the Straight Path.And that Allâh may help you with strong help.He it is Who sent down As-Sakinah (calmness and tranquility) into the hearts of the believers, that they may grow more in Faith along with their (present) Faith'.(48:1-4)Reply

What! Have they settled some Plan (among themselves)? But it is We Who settle things.(43:79) Raqib nizami (talk) 21:18, 6 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Barelvi Article

edit

Hi! It is long time to see Your edits.Barelvi Article needs your contributions.Hope to see You there. Shabiha 16:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sunni Dawat-e-Islami for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sunni Dawat-e-Islami is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunni Dawat-e-Islami until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 06:35, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:TheTwilight.jpg

edit
 

The file File:TheTwilight.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This image has now been moved to commons, and there it has been reviewed; no issues there.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —usernamekiran(talk) 06:45, 28 May 2017 (UTC)Reply