Welcome

edit

Hello, Cm8587a and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students.

Go through our online training for students.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Helpme}} before the question. Please also read this helpful advice for students.

Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.

Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, if your class doesn't already have one. It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{Educational assignment}} on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and aid your communication with them.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! Jprg1966 (talk) 22:03, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 05:37, Wednesday, November 20, 2024 (UTC)


Welcome!

edit

Hi Cm8587a , I saw your question on the breakfast project talk page. Looks like you've got the hang of things and are making some good edits. In case you still want more general advice, a good if rather long page to read is Wikipedia:A Primer for newcomers. We are glad you've joined us. FeydHuxtable (talk) 16:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Charlotte Gower Chapman

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Charlotte Gower Chapman, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.flickr.com/photos/smithsonian/5493789731/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:22, 18 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Smithsonian Institution Archives Barnstar

edit
  Smithsonian Institution Archives barnstar
Thank you for your bringing Charlotte Gower Chapman to Wikipedia! Here is a token of our appreciation. --Digitaleffie (talk) 15:04, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Charlotte Gower Chapman reference suggestion

edit

I recently went into your article on Charlotte Gower Chapman and cleaned a few things up. It's a nice article on someone that definitely needed to be on Wikipedia, thank you for making it. I also added another reference to it, Excluded Ancestors, Inventible Traditions, which you may find useful in expanding the article, as it has an entire chapter devoted to Chapman's life. I wish you well. SilverserenC 02:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Larry McNeil (photographer)

edit
 

The article Larry McNeil (photographer) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jinkinson talk to me 20:15, 1 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Larry McNeil

edit

I just read your blog post about Larry McNeil and thought I would help out a bit. So I made some additions to the article in regards to content and references. I hope it helps.

Also, i'm glad you're feeling more confident about Wikipedia and its reliability. While I certainly would never outright consider it reliable without checking the sources of an article, Wikipedia is still a pretty good resource that you can trust in general to have helpful information. SilverserenC 01:43, 12 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

August 2016

edit

  Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to Miky Fabrega. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this: |image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]], instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do: |image=SomeImage.jpg. There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:53, 5 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Miky Fabrega

edit
 

The article Miky Fabrega has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:54, 5 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Hello Cm8587a, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Miky Fabrega has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:06, 6 August 2016 (UTC)Reply