Cluetrekk

Cluetrekk, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Cluetrekk! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:26, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Swears (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Swears and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 15:11, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Draft:New Swears concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:New Swears, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Swears (November 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Swears and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 09:17, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:New Swears has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:New Swears. Thanks! Flat Out (talk) 04:40, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:New Swears has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:New Swears. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 06:18, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:New Swears has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:New Swears. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:26, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Swears has been accepted

New Swears, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question about New_Swears

Hello, Cluetrekk! I'm Wikiisawesome. I have replied to your question about New_Swears at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. /wia /tlk 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Sourcing

Please do not re-add information to the article that is not sourced. What you've done is add three claims: that a radio show called it the best album of the year, that it was on a film soundtrack, and that it was nominated for PunkNews.org's best of list. None of these can be verified, which is something that Wikipedia needs in order to post that information.

With the soundtrack, the film page doesn't say anything about the soundtrack at all - not even a brief mention. If they had a listing that'd be different, but it doesn't. With that, all I want is for you to provide a source that shows the film's soundtrack listing. Have they released the soundtrack anywhere? If so, a track listing on a site that hosts information about things like that would be usable, like Discogs.

Now the radio bit is a little more difficult for several reasons. The first is that the link you give for this is dead - it doesn't bring up anything about the show at all. However even if it did come up, you'd also have to show where this radio show is notable enough for this to really merit a mention. There are thousands of radio stations out there, not including the ones that are Internet only. For example there are at least a good 20-30 stations in my area and if each has 3 shows that air each day, that's at least 60-90 shows. (It's likely higher, since some shows only air on specific days.) When you multiply that by a country, the number grows insanely high. There are so many that a mention on anything other than a particularly major show would be considered too minor to really list unless it got repeated in RS. Also, the other issue is that radio show hosts tend to say quite a few things in the spur of a moment. Unless the number one claim was stated as an official opinion, preferably as part of a "best of the year" episode, it's likely that it won't be considered usable. The other problem with this is that you had misrepresented a good many of the sources in the article, to the point where it can be considered outright deception. Because of this, I have to assume that the radio claim could be a misconstrued comment or something else entirely.

Finally, the PunkNews.org claim was completely unsourced. The site is considered to be a reliable source for the most part, but you need to back this up with a source that actually supports the claim. Unsourced content can be challenged and removed, which is the case here.

I'm not opposed to you re-adding information about the soundtrack or PunkNews.org, although I'd like to ask that you not re-add the radio station since that looks to have been a minor, local show. What I want, however, is for you to only add the information about the soundtrack and PN.o when you have sources that explicitly state the claims. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:45, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cluetrekk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Cluetrekk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cluetrekk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cluetrekk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)