Chandlerburr
Duplicate images uploaded
editThanks for uploading Image:Chandler Burr in 2005.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Picture 039- at 706k.jpg. The copy called Image:Picture 039- at 706k.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 04:30, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Your edit to Sexual Orientation
editChandlerburr, I have removed most of what you recently added to Sexual Orientation because it looked like a blatant attempt to bias the article. Using your own book as a source is problematic and provocative. Some of the material you added seems to me useful; I have placed it in a different part of the article. I wish you could have used it in a more thoughtful way. Skoojal (talk) 07:45, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Skoojal, I'm not an expert at editing on Wikipedia, and there is perhaps a way to contact you directly, but if there is, I can't figure it out. My own email is chandlerburr@gmail.com. Obviously I am happy to discuss the merits and demerits of content on Wikipedia, but my additions to the Sexual Orientation entry are not at all an "attempt to bias the article" any more or less than your edits are. They are, rather, an attempt to add important data that is missing. My book uses data from other sources; I'm happy to quote those sources instead of my book if that is better. To quote you to you, I wish you could have reacted in a more thoughtful way. I am not going to undo your changes at the moment; I'm going to ask you to write me and explain your objections. ChandlerChandlerburr (talk) 15:03, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
- My email address is a.quadrant@yahoo.com. By all means contact me if you like, but I think any discussions about the content of the Sexual Orientation article should be had here, on Wikipedia, in public. Skoojal (talk) 22:36, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Welcome
editOn a more friendly note,
Welcome!
Hello, Chandlerburr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Skoojal (talk) 07:44, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
editYour upload of File:Chandler Burr in 2005.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:24, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Non-objective
editThe article Non-objective has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Dictionary definition, WP:NOTDICDEF applies. I won't redirect to Abstract art because the title doesn't even specifically refer to art.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Largoplazo (talk) 02:54, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editYour thread has been archived
editHi Chandlerburr! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Problematic use of the word "homely" in this article.
editIn this article, this sentence appears: "In mainland Chinese culture, villages have homely connotations." The problem is that "homely" means completely different things in North American English and in British English. (This is a problem with this word's use that exists throughout Wikipedia.) Definition of homely (adjective). 1. NORTH AMERICAN (used almost exclusively about a person) Unattractive in appearance, plain-featured, unlovely, ugly. (Opposite: attractive). 2.BRITISH (used almost exclusively about places or surroundings) Simple but cozy and comfortable, as in one's own home, nicely familiar, welcoming and home-like. Therefore to North Americans, "villages have homely connotations" is non-sensical; the meaning might be interpreted "villages connote plain, ugly people [living there]", which is not at all the intended meaning. Suggest clarifying the wording with "villages suggest home, familiarity, and comfort." Chandlerburr (talk) 04:40, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
editArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Factually incorrect datum in Wiki on "8kun"
editIn the wiki https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/8chan there is the following statement: "... '-chan' can be interpreted as the one generally used for young children, especially females, while '-kun' suffix is used for younger males in general..." The words "especially females" are factually incorrect. The suffix "-chan" is used equally for boys and girls. There is no gender associated with it at all. (By contrast, "kun" is used almost exclusively for boys.) The words "especially females" should be deleted. Chandlerburr (talk) 05:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)