Cauzality

Explaining

I patrolled your page. I went through the enormously-backlogged list of newly-created pages and confirmed that your page was okay: not spam, not an attack page, not a copyright violation, not any of the other reasons for which I would delete someone's page without asking. Then I clicked "patrolled" to remove it from the list of "pages that have not yet been patrolled", and moved on to the next entry. That's all. DS (talk) 21:14, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Your recent editing history at Inductive reasoning shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Arc de Ciel (talk) 11:02, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Inductive reasoning

Just to let you know that I moved your comment to the end of the page before responding, because the discussion you placed it in was actually about a different topic. Arc de Ciel (talk) 03:49, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

• thanks... i'm trying to learn how to do things properly.--Cauzality (talk) 13:59, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

No problem. Welcome to Wikipedia. :-) Arc de Ciel (talk) 22:12, 18 August 2013 (UTC)