User talk:Carbrera/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

→

Archive 10

Your GA nomination of Wayzata Bay Center

The article Wayzata Bay Center you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wayzata Bay Center for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 04:21, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

You'll See

Did you check that I had responded to the GA reviews? —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 18:14, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

@IndianBio: I just did. I'll respond within the next day so I can reread the entire article throughly. Sorry for the inconvenience. Carbrera (talk) 22:27, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Talk:All I Ask (Adele song)/GA2

Hello Carbrera. I don't believe we have had communications on Wikipedia before. I am sorry to say that I have had to interject on your review of "All I Ask" and give it a quick-fail. A comprehensive decision detailing the reasons why I have had to do this are on the review page for the song.  — Calvin999 08:50, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Carbrera, as you will have noticed, it is not allowed that another reviewer close a review you have opened and are working on, so Calvin999's "quick-fail" has been reverted. The GA2 review is yours, and you may proceed however you wish and render a final verdict in due course. I imagine that you will want to consult the previous GA review at some point, Talk:All I Ask (Adele song)/GA1, to see what issues arose the first time around. It doesn't appear that there have been significant changes to the article since the previous review, which is not a good sign, but perhaps you will have better luck. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:04, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

That is exactly why I quick failed it and interjected BlueMoonset. When the nominator has done zilch to the article since the previous GAN, it's a nomination on whim and shouldn't be nominated. It's a waste of time. I've done this several time before and several of my friends have done it too.  — Calvin999 08:46, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

If what Calvin999 did is not allowable, then how is it allowable to immediately reverse a GA given because you don't agree with how the GA was performed, BlueMoonset (as you did at Billy the Kid)? -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 13:42, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Calvin999, you were certainly welcome to post a comment to the already open review noting the continuing issues, and even recommending that Carbrera fail it out of hand. If Carbrera had not opened the review, you could have quickfailed it yourself. But once Carbrera had opened the review, the decision was (and is) Carbrera's: Other editors are also welcome to comment and work on the article, but the final decision on listing will be with the first reviewer.

Winkelvi, this is from the other end: the actual reviewer, Cabrera, hadn't done anything that was problematic. In the case of Billy the Kid, we had a new reviewer who had plunged in way over his head, completely bollixed up the review page name and format, and hadn't applied the GA criteria. I backed things up to the point just before the close, fixed the review page, and pointed out the issues. If the reviewer had gone ahead and redone the approval, that would have been it: the approval would have stuck, and other avenues would have come into play. But the reviewer realized that their foray had been problematic, and the review resumed from there. There's a world of difference between an inadvisable nomination and a new reviewer in over his or her head. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Circumstances are different, however, the fact remains that you intervened and made a decision on your own, you didn't go to the reviewer first to consult, you just reversed the GA. Not that it shouldn't have been reversed - it should have. But, frankly, I don't see your action as any different than Calvin's. A more experienced and obviously wiser reviewer took the reins and did the right thing - in both cases. You even alluded here, above, that the article should not have been nominated again without some serious work being done first. Is there any specific policy that says what Calvin did was wrong? -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 21:35, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Since I left my note, stating that I will be reviewing the article, I would appreciate if I could do just that. If the article is of bad quality, I will recommend what the nominator should do to make it GA status. If the article is of good quality, I will leave suggestions like I always do, and then pass it. Primarily, I have many other articles to review first, so don't expect a review for awhile. Carbrera (talk) 21:40, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Hence why I interjected. Carbrera, MF has not made any improvement in between nominations. It was a whim nomination. Anyone else and it would have been ejected straight away. It's a waste of time.  — Calvin999 22:01, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

@Calvin999: Well, actually it wouldn't be a waste of time, as I'm competing in the GA Cup, so I will give a thorough, honest, and detailed review. Carbrera (talk) 22:06, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Ah, well, you have a vested interested in just scoring points then to ensure you proceed to the next round. From a moral point of view, the review should not take place. The nominator has made absolutely and unequivocally no effort at all to improve the article since the previous GAN. That is grounds for an immediate quick fail. I don't see how you can think of passing it when the nominator refuses to make any changes suggested previously.  — Calvin999 22:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

@Calvin999: To be honest, I don't really appreciate what you're implying. Yes, it's true I'm reviewing it to receive points, but if I only cared about just receiving points–would I really have decided to review an article that's been up for just a few days? No, I picked this to review because I'm interested with the topic and I'm knowledgeable of the topic. Please, just allow me to review the article and feel free to post your opinion of my review there. Thank you. Carbrera (talk) 23:07, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Make Me Like You

The article Make Me Like You you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Make Me Like You for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 05:21, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Southdale Center

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Southdale Center you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will (talk) 11:20, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ridgedale Center

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ridgedale Center you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will (talk) 11:21, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Southtown Center

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Southtown Center you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will (talk) 11:22, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Grove (Maple Grove, Minnesota)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Grove (Maple Grove, Minnesota) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will (talk) 11:22, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Four Seasons Mall

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Four Seasons Mall you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will (talk) 11:22, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Make Me Like You.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Make Me Like You.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Four Seasons Mall

The article Four Seasons Mall you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Four Seasons Mall for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will (talk) 07:41, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of You Don't Know Anything

The article You Don't Know Anything you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:You Don't Know Anything for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 13:41, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Carbrera, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:10, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Four Seasons Mall has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Carbrera. Four Seasons Mall, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 23:00, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

GAR input

Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Eminem/1 has only gotten "neutral" votes since its initation. Your input is welcome on whether it should be delisted. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:22, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited You Don't Know Anything, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adam Chase. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi Carbrera...

Hi @Carbrera: As you know, we have been doing a lot of good to some articles in the past, and I am willing to work with you more on future articles I submit However, there is one question/task I was wanting you to do, that if you have the time of course. Its regarding an article you reviewed, but you had to fail due to my busy schedule; the article is the Ami Suzuki song, "All Night Long". I was wondering if you could have a little jot over it again to see if there is anything I could do to improve it, in order to have it listed as a WP:Good article. The article was basically finished, only with very little touch ups needed for it. Cheers, CaliforniaDreamsFan (talk · contribs} 00:27, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

@CaliforniaDreamsFan: Well I would be happy to look over it again, just nominate it and then I'll read through everything again. However, I will not put it on my GA Cup resumé as it'll need minimal changes compared to the first time you nominated it. Thanks! I also enjoy working with you, Carbrera (talk) 00:36, 17 April 2016 (UTC).

You have been invited to join the Meghan Trainor WikiProject, a WikiProject on the English Wikipedia dedicated to improving articles and lists related to Meghan Trainor. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page and add your name to the list of participants. Thank You.

A page you started (The Pop Kids) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating The Pop Kids, Carbrera!

Wikipedia editor Laberkiste just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Notable, but no references.

To reply, leave a comment on Laberkiste's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

DYK for Four Seasons Mall

On 20 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Four Seasons Mall, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that city officials in Plymouth, Minnesota, opposed the idea of a 240,000-square-foot (22,000 m²) Walmart Supercenter replacing the Four Seasons Mall? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Four Seasons Mall. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Four Seasons Mall), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Worm^TT(talk) 09:02, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Southtown Center

The article Southtown Center you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Southtown Center for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will (talk) 10:01, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Har Mar Mall

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Har Mar Mall you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ruby2010 -- Ruby2010 (talk) 02:40, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Wayzata Bay Center at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:05, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Distant Lights (song)

added a link pointing to EDM

Pretty Mess (album)

added a link pointing to EDM

Roller Coaster (Erika Jayne song)

added a link pointing to EDM

This Is the Day (Ivy song)

added a link pointing to Blondie

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Make Me Like You

Hello Carbrera: The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Make Me Like You has been completed.

You will notice that I archived one the article’s citations (#1). I suggest that you archive the rest of the URLs as time allows. This ensures that the article's references are available "forever" and that it doesn’t develop “dead links” over time. The site I use is https://archive.org/web/. Simply copy the URL in the citation and paste it in the box on the archive.org site and click save. This creates a copy of the original page and provides you with a new URL to add to the original citation. If you look at the URL I've archived you'll see the syntax. You add the new URL to the end of the original citation like this: |archiveurl= http etc|archivedate=13 February 2015}}. Not all websites allow archiving - CBS TV news and the NY Times are two I've come across, so there's not much you can do about that unless there is an alternate citation you could use.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind regards, Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:05, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Ivy – Disappointed.png

Thank you for uploading File:Ivy – Disappointed.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Josh Milburn (talk) 16:46, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Make Me Like You

The article Make Me Like You you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Make Me Like You for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 23:21, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Awaiting reviews

Hi, how's the GAN process for articles that I nominated (e.g. I Got a Boy (song), The Boys (Girls' Generation song))? I can see that it's been over a week or two and there's no input yet. Simon (talk) 08:56, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rich Girl (Gwen Stefani song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rich Girl (Gwen Stefani song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HĐ -- HĐ (talk) 13:00, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Har Mar Mall

The article Har Mar Mall you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Har Mar Mall for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ruby2010 -- Ruby2010 (talk) 17:20, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ridgedale Center

The article Ridgedale Center you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ridgedale Center for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will (talk) 10:21, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Now That You Got It

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Now That You Got It you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:00, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Now That You Got It

The article Now That You Got It you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Now That You Got It for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Southdale Center

The article Southdale Center you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Southdale Center for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will (talk) 08:21, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rich Girl (Gwen Stefani song)

The article Rich Girl (Gwen Stefani song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rich Girl (Gwen Stefani song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HĐ -- HĐ (talk) 14:00, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Outstanding GA reviews

Carbrera, I was very surprised to see that you just claimed a new GAN to review, Talk:Acquacotta/GA1, given that you already have seven open yet untouched reviews that are as much as four weeks old. Perhaps you should consider holding off opening any additional reviews until your backlog has been reduced much further, so nominators, many of whom have been waiting for months, don't have to suffer further delays. Right now you have the following that need your attention:

• April 2: Talk:I Got a Boy (song)/GA1
• April 5: Talk:1938–39 Oregon Webfoots men's basketball team/GA1
• April 7: Talk:HTC First/GA1
• April 10: Talk:Reed v. Town of Gilbert/GA1
• April 10: Talk:Duncan Robinson (basketball)/GA1
• April 11: Talk:Everett Strupper/GA1
• April 11: Talk:New England Patriots/GA1 — this is currently the oldest existing nomination, and has been waiting for over eight months

I think it's great that you've been so enthusiastically reviewing GA nominations, and very much hope you don't burn out—your comment in the Reed v. Town of Gilbert review indicated that you were in danger of same. I'd imagine that reducing your backlog will help reduce the pressure on you, as well as the other benefits. Best of luck in the GA Cup! BlueMoonset (talk) 18:11, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Carbrera, all six of these nominations that remained unstarted—you completed Reed v. Town of Gilbert—have been returned to the reviewing pool by an admin, and subsequently selected by other reviewers. I'm sorry you weren't able to find the time to start them. You'll want to remove them from your GA Cup listings. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rich Girl (Gwen Stefani song)

The article Rich Girl (Gwen Stefani song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rich Girl (Gwen Stefani song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HĐ -- HĐ (talk) 03:01, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Grove (Maple Grove, Minnesota)

The article The Grove (Maple Grove, Minnesota) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Grove (Maple Grove, Minnesota) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will (talk) 09:01, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 GA Cup-Round 3

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016 GA Cup - Round 3 Hello, GA Cup competitors! Thursday saw the end of Round 2. Sainsf once again took out Round 2 with an amazing score of 996 (a higher score then he received in Round 1!). In second place, MPJ-DK earned an astounding 541 points, and in third place, Carbrera received 419 points. In Round 2, 142 reviews were completed! At the beginning of April, there were 486 outstanding nominations in the GAN queue; by the end of Round 1, there were 384. Another demonstrable way in which this competition has made a difference is in the length of time articles languish in the queue. At the beginning of this GA Cup, the longest wait was over 9 months [1]; at the end of Round 2, the longest wait had decreased significantly, to a little over 5 months.[2] It's clear that we continue to make a difference at GAN and throughout Wikipedia, something we should all be proud of. Thanks to all our competitors for helping to make the GA Cup a continued success, and for your part in helping other editors improve articles. We hope to see all remaining users fighting it out in Round 3 so we can keep lowering the backlog as much as possible. To qualify for the third round, contestants had to earn the two highest scores in each of the four pools in Round 2; plus, one wildcard. We had an unusual occurrence happen in Round 2: because only one contestant submitted reviews in one pool, we selected the contestant with the next highest score to move forward to Round 3. (There will be a rule change for future competitions in case something like this happens again.) For Round 3, users were placed in 3 random pools of 3. To qualify for the Final of the 3rd Annual GA Cup, the top user in each pool will progress, and there will also be one wildcard. This means that the participant who comes in 4th place (all pools combined) will also move on. Round 3 will start on May 1 at 0:00:01 UTC and end on May 29 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Round 3 and the pools can be found here. Good luck and have fun! Cheers from Figureskatingfan, 3family6, Jaguar, MrWooHoo, and Zwerg Nase. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Carbrera. You have new messages at Talk:Acquacotta/GA1.
Message added 16:11, 4 May 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thank you for reviewing! I have addressed the points of your review. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:11, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chelsea (song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chelsea (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HĐ -- HĐ (talk) 11:40, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Disappointed (Ivy song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Disappointed (Ivy song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HĐ -- HĐ (talk) 11:41, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

GA Cup-Round 3 Clarification

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016 GA Cup - Round 3 Hello, GA Cup competitors! It has been brought to our attention that we made a mistake in the last newsletter. In the last newsletter, we said that the "4th place" overall would make the Final along with the top user from each pool. However, the users who will advance will be the top user from each pool along with "4th and 5th place" overall. We apologize for any inconvenience or confusion that we caused. Cheers from Figureskatingfan, 3family6, Jaguar, MrWooHoo, and Zwerg Nase. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chelsea (song)

The article Chelsea (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Chelsea (song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HĐ -- HĐ (talk) 09:40, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Disappointed (Ivy song)

The article Disappointed (Ivy song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Disappointed (Ivy song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HĐ -- HĐ (talk) 03:41, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello Carbrera...

I Saw you removed the added track section on "Rave Un2 the Joy fantastic", why ? Because having both disks (and it's not some Outtake), is how I know the rare one exist. Please let me know if something needs to be added or explained.

JanPT To reply, leave a comment on https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User_talk:JanPT. —Preceding undated comment added 20:34, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

ADDED; It appears to be the same as the 'Japanese edition' see "http://dawnation.com/menu2/ru2tjf.html". But the box is nearly identical to the normal release. I can provide pictures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JanPT (talk • contribs) 21:52, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chelsea (song)

The article Chelsea (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Chelsea (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HĐ -- HĐ (talk) 13:21, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Disappointed (Ivy song)

The article Disappointed (Ivy song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Disappointed (Ivy song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HĐ -- HĐ (talk) 13:21, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Settle Down (No Doubt song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Settle Down (No Doubt song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 05:01, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Now That You Got It

The article Now That You Got It you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Now That You Got It for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:41, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Distant Lights (song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Distant Lights (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:41, 21 May 2016 (UTC)