Callmejones

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Callmejones/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Callmejones/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:27, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Callmejones! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 11:27, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello Theroadislong,

He has over a million followers on Instagram and YouTube, Facebook, and all are verified. He lacks references from other sites, but how can that mean he is not notable? He is not a celeb, he is having a good number of people following him for his field!!!

Can you consider the notability again??? Callmejones (talk) 11:33, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

The number of followers he has is irrelevant, in order to demonstrate notability, you will need to provide multiple references to in-depth articles written about him in unrelated, independent journals, magazines, books or online. Any article should be based on them alone, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, Twitter and Amazon are not reliable independent sources. Theroadislong (talk) 11:45, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

So, if there are more articles about him, he is eligible for Wikipedia as of his current status?

Also, wouldn't Wikipedia be helpful to 1000K people that follow him? Callmejones (talk) 11:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not in the "helpful" business. This is a common misunderstanding. It is an encyclopedia that documents content (articles) that have been created and edited by people with no personal connection to the topic (there is a restricted allowance for conflict-of-interest and paid editing). My advice is remove Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Amazon refs, tighten the content, add reliable source refs if they can be found, and resubmit. David notMD (talk) 13:29, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Callmejones! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, My article is a mess. I need help formatting it before the submission is reviewed., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:TheDadLab, from its old location at User:Callmejones/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 14:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: TheDadLab (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TheDadLab and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:TheDadLab, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 00:56, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:TheDadLab

Hello, Callmejones. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "TheDadLab".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:17, 1 September 2021 (UTC)