Cakelot1

Learn more about this page


Home	Talk	Pages	Commons	Wikisource

Archives

Archive 1

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Cakelot1. Thank you for your work on Flag of Exmoor. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Killing of Laken Riley.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Gottagotospace (talk) 22:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

lightning process

Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Cakelot1/Bar I was disappointed by your edit. You do a disservice to readers by omitting a summary of the BBC File on 4, and excluding errors made in the report. You do a disservice to everyone with these chronic conditions by ommitting the recovery story alongside the stories of people who didn't get change. There are many of these recovery stories in the press and research which are being frequently ignored. The rapid recovery stories are important as they show that there is a system capable of rapid change involved in at least some people alongside other physical issues identified by research. This needs to be researched as part of the process of understanding and for developing medications for helping people to recover from this condition/group of conditions. Unfortunately almost no research has been happening into how patients are recovering. Verity Verity&Science1 (talk) 08:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Verity&Science1, Wikipedia articles are based on reliable sources not on our own feelings. As I said in my edit summary, you've inserted a load of WP:FRINGE WP:OR and WP:SYNTH (each on of those links is to a Policies and/or guideline that I recommend you read). We arn't here to write an original essay rebutting the points of a program (where such rebuttals aren't present in the sources). For example where is the claim that the program was controversial supported by a reliable source. Additionally, as this is a medical topic the higher standard of WP:MEDRES also applies. I intend to bring this to the WP:FTN as fringe medical theories is not an area I edit much. I will also open a section on the talk page so it can be discussed more widely. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 15:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Cakelot1. Thank you for your work on Scoria brick. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:15, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply