COGDEN

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

• From the Editor
• What are You doing For Lent?
• Fun and Exciting Contest Launched
• Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism

---

Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions and subscriptions contact the Newsroom

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, COGDEN. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

Missing cite in Life of Joseph Smith from 1827 to 1830

The article cites "Blair 1879" but no such source is listed in the bibliography. It was added by you back in 2005. Can you please add the full cite? Thanks, Renata•3 01:52, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

This was a good question. I must have forgot to give the full citation, which would be W.W. Blair, Saints' Herald 26 (June 15, 1879): 190-91 COGDEN 07:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:57, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Do you want to help get the Joseph Smith article to Featured Article status? ~Awilley (talk) 03:44, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Yes, maybe. I'll take a look. Thanks. COGDEN 05:35, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Oldsmobile

As an administrator, could you please look at this temp page (https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Talk:Oldsmobile/Temp) for the Oldsmobile article, to see if it still contains copyright infringement. I'm pretty sure it's in a good target zone now. I realize this is out of the blue, but I'd prefer to get a third opinion. Thanks. 842U (talk) 22:15, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

It looks like this temp page was deleted. COGDEN 00:25, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions have been removed.

Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux ^Talk 02:23, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jarom

The article Jarom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 23 March 2024 (UTC)