CBNMKJUH

This is CBNMKJUH's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Super Mario FX(game) (February 6)

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

You can't cite Wikipedia on itself. To justify having an article about this game, you would need to show serious media coverage about this planned-but-never-released game. Unless it's been covered in serious media, then it's not significant enough for us to cover.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Super Mario FX(game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Super Mario FX(game), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, CBNMKJUH! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi there. Just to let you know that I removed some of your comments from Wikipedia:Teahouse. I suggest that you gain some more experience editing Wikipedia before you attempt to answer questions there. You are of course welcome to ask questions at the Teahouse as you learn about editing Wikipedia. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:32, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

CBNMKJUH's response???

I-i'm n-not good enough? I-i wa-was the first one to c-come up with an answer.CBNMKJUH (talk) 1:07 PM, 6 February 2018

May 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ben Shapiro. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 17:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kim Jong-un, you may be blocked from editing. CentreLeftRight ✉ 18:46, 26 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Gamaliel (talk) 22:20, 26 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic