Welcome Broadwood-park!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 48,324,156 registered editors!
Hello Broadwood-park. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Rasnaboy, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:
    Introduction to Wikipedia
    The five pillars of Wikipedia
    Editing tutorial
    How to edit a page
    Simplified Manual of Style
    The basics of Wikicode
    How to develop an article
    How to create an article
    Help pages
    What Wikipedia is not
Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
    Do be bold
    Do assume good faith
    Do be civil
    Do keep cool!
    Do maintain a neutral point of view
    Don't spam
    Don't infringe copyright
    Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest
    Don't commit vandalism
    Don't get blocked
If you need further help, you can:
    Ask a question
or you can:
    Get help at the Teahouse
or even:
    Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
    Fight vandalism
    Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome
    Help contribute to articles
    Perform maintenance tasks
           
    Become a member of a project that interests you
    Help design new templates
    Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to:

  • Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the   button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
  • Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, Rasnaboy (talk) 05:53, 2 April 2020 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)Reply

Welcome to the very wide world of Wikipedia

edit

The English Wikipedia gets a great many readers and editors from many English-speaking countries, not just the US. In accordance with that, Wikipedia supports all the varieties of English in articles. Please read the section detailing this at WP:ENGVAR. It prohibits changing the spelling of words in an article between American and British English without establishing prior consensus on the talk page. Any edits that don't follow this policy must be reverted.

In a related issue, please also check out WP:LQ. --A D Monroe III(talk) 01:04, 11 April 2020 (UTC)Reply


noted.

--Broadwood-park (talk) 22:30, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Grammar-checker editing?

edit

Reviewing more edits, I'm seeing a pattern of a repeated misunderstanding of certain kinds of nuanced grammar, such as changing "built in {year}" to "built-in {year}" -- a very clumsy mistake. Are these edits the result of some grammar-checking application? While I'd say most of the changes are fine, a good percentage are breaking the intent of the sentence. This is creating more work for other editors, which is an overall net loss to WP. While they can be used to give hints on editing, results from grammar checkers cannot be used automatically on WP; if they could, we would have already created a WP:BOT to do this. Even if you are not using such an application, you need to be much more careful in double-checking your edits. --A D Monroe III(talk) 01:37, 11 April 2020 (UTC)Reply


"clumsily," noted.


--Broadwood-park (talk) 22:32, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please do not copy edit the entire article in one single edit. You are making errors, among them changing image filenames (you cannot edit those for grammar!), but also quite a few others. When you make only one edit, you leave no option for others but to revert the edit. Please edit a section, even sub-section, at a time. Please click on "show preview" and examine it once before publishing the changes. Thanks. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 23:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply


Noted, however, "show preview" would be much more useful if it used a "show history" like preview, allowing reverts within the side by side comparison, or to enable reverts directly within the "show history" side by side ... isn't that the result described above you want. In other words, expand my ability to correct, rather than shrinking my ability to edit.

--Broadwood-park (talk) 16:27, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

This in no way addresses the issues you are creating. No tool as you describe exists, and I don't see how it would help anyway. The only solution available is for you to improve the quality of your edits. --A D Monroe III(talk) 21:02, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply


...ouch, I'm hurt. --Broadwood-park (talk) 23:40, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

It's clear to me that either you are not examining individually all the changes you are making via script, in which case you need to slow down and start doing so ASAP, or your command of English is insufficient for you to be making copyedits. Either way please desist. Consider this a caution as if you continue your current course you are likely headed for a block. Spectrum {{UV}} 2604:2000:8FC0:4:68BA:3B32:8613:8B6D (talk) 23:24, 18 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Don't get blocked

edit

I've had to revert another of your edits, which was done after you replied to the above, for multiple WP:MOS violations.

I've just been informed that we have a policy, WP:MEATBOT that covers the kind of edits you have continued to do -- editing patterns that emphasize quantity over quality. Regardless of whether the cause is repeated carelessness or over-reliance on some sort of automation, it is considered disruptive, and users will be blocked if they persist.

Please immediately change your editing habits to continue to contribute to Wikipedia. --A D Monroe III(talk) 23:25, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply


See my comments above @16:21, 14/Apr. - Thank-You. --Broadwood-park (talk) 02:04, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Only warning

edit

Too many of your edits contain too many obvious errors, besides unnecessary elements. Judging from the kinds of mistakes you make, I have to say I am not convinced you have the competency required to edit Wikipedia, especially not edits that mention "grammar" in the summary. Obviously I am not the first one to notice this. If this continues, I will have no choice but to block you. Drmies (talk) 04:03, 19 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Seconded, @Drmies: re: Evolving the Alien. —swpbT • go beyond • bad idea 22:27, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

April 2020

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 00:31, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply