User talk:Brewcrewer/Archives/2013/March

Express my lack of appreciation

I came her to express my lack of appreciation for your removal of my comment on Talk:Elazar Shach. I think my comment was very much to the point, which is that User:IZAK was engaging in his habitual long post fulminating against Chabad-related editors on Wikipedia. If you removed my post, you should have done the same to his post. Which, by the way, was my basic drift here, that his posts are not really related to the subject.

In addition, if you want, I can point out the lie in his post. I do not throw words like "untruths" around without knowing what I am referring to. And this Shach rabbi was a very controversial figure, and indeed did behave during his lifetime in precisely the same vein. Debresser (talk) 00:01, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Operation Pillar of Defense

The RS you deleted from the Operation Pillar of Defense page without explanation states:-

• "Israel's blockade of Gaza is a clear violation of international humanitarian law, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has said. ".

The associated statement from the article you deleted without explanation stated (bold section deleted by you)

• "The International Committee of the Red Cross found that Israel's blockade of Gaza constitutes "collective punishment" and is clearly illegal under under international humanitarian law"

If you think that our statement could be improved in any way to more accurately reflect the cited RS, then by all means make a suggestion, but simply deleting the entire statement and reliable source without explanation is purely disruptive behavior. I would ask you to self revert or explain your actions on the articles talk page. Dlv999 (talk) 18:06, 8 March 2013 (UTC)