User talk:Bogger/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Bogger. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
DYK nomination of John Hamon
Hello! Your submission of John Hamon at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Nomination of Emilie Guimond-Bélanger for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emilie Guimond-Bélanger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emilie Guimond-Bélanger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 15:20, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
December 2018 at Women in Red
Continuing: | ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
January 2019 at Women in Red
|
 January events:
|
New info on Initiative Q talk page
Dear Bogger,
I noticed you contributed to the Initiative Q page a while back. I put some new info on the Initiative Q talk page you may want to consider. Please see https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Talk:Initiative_Q
Thank you Reydelhumus (talk) 15:02, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! |
|
Hello Bogger, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
February 2019 at Women in Red
|
 February events:
|
March 2019 at Women in Red
|
   Please join us for these virtual events:
| ||
|
|
Wikiproject United Nations: We need you!
Dear Bogger, I noticed your name was under the participants' list of WikiProject United Nations. I wanted to invite you to contribute to the advancement of this project. Here's how you can do so: 1. Select the latest CC BY SA publications for which no articles have been created yet available here: https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_United_Nations/Open_Access_text/Education_publications 2. Follow the instructions available here: https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Help:Adding_open_license_text_to_Wikipedia 3. Add the text to Wikipedia (either by creating new articles or adding content to existing ones). Since these are available under CC BY SA, you can copy/paste content and/or edit if need be. 4. Attribute the text using the 'Free-content attribution' template in the 'Sources' section. 5. Add your contribution in the table here: https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_United_Nations/Open_Access_text/Education_publications Don't hesitate to reach out if you have any questions! Looking forward to working with you on enriching Wikipedia, one article at a time:)! C.recalde — Preceding unsigned comment added by C.recalde (talk • contribs) 11:21, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
April 2019 at Women in Red
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:12, 27 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May you join this month's editathons from WiR!
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:16, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Harriet Kemsley listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Harriet Kemsley. Since you had some involvement with the Harriet Kemsley redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Launchballer 20:43, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
June events with WIR
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hiya. A weird left-field question. Which you are, of course, entirely free to ignore :) What prompted you to write the article? Did something happen recently that it put it (back?) on your radar? (I ask mainly as I happened to see Kearns' book in a bargain bin recently, and so was then intrigued when I saw the article pop-up as a DYK candidate at around the same time. To the extent that I went back and bought the book....) Guliolopez (talk) 11:12, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- Every Paddy's Day the parish priest pulls out the CD and plays "Hail Glorious Saint Patrick", I took that as a sign of notability. It is only mentioned via it's author Sister Agnes, so I thought it worth researching if I'd imagined how successful the album was at the time. I can't find a source to put it in List of best-selling albums by country#Ireland. Bogger (talk) 11:22, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- I also created Pope John Paul II's visit to Ireland, I'm 70% sure that was not a figment of my imagination either. Bogger (talk) 11:24, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- Okeydokey. Thanks. Just to be clear, I wasn't asking because I thought there was a problem with notability or reality or anything (it absolutely is notable and worthy of coverage). I was only asking because I found the coincidence intriguing :) (That it popped into my peripheral vision again at around the same time as it did yours). And I was therefore just wondering if something specific had triggered you to write it now. (Perhaps you saw the same book in the same shop even.) That's all. No panic :) Guliolopez (talk) 11:31, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
June 2019
Your recent editing history at Calibra shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
It is WP:BRD not BRRRD. You've incompletely moved my comments missing the crucial (explaining) aspect to show you nagivation is per guideline and essay, continuing to edit war your unilateral and contested change of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC (and then unilateral removal of primary topic) rather than discuss despite breaking the navigation setout per the dabs and hatnotes. Rather than go fix them all when they're now disrupted, how about we get more opinions, and you self revert so the nav is all working again? You haven't even used the redirect I created Calibra (company). It's a disruptive mess. Widefox; talk 09:32, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- So I made a change you reverted, I reverted citing evidence that searches for "Calibra" rose significantly due to facebook, you reverted citing comparable weighting for both, so I created a disambiguation page, and in the talk page I stated, and I stated again that I wouldn't undo your revert again, pending discussion. I hadn't seen your [Calibra (company)]] redirect. I think it's close to, but not yet an edit war. But obviously I'm biased. Mea culpa. I will self revert. Bogger (talk) 09:44, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- The only thing unclear to me is the Wikidata aspect. Can you explain please, in case I need to get something changed there to align with Wikipedia's aims? Widefox; talk 10:07, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- [1] Wikidata is a collection of entities and relationships. Many of these entities have wikipedia articles, some do not. A Wikidata redirect in wikipedia allows a link to a wikidata page for an entity not yet considered article worthy. If I find a redirect which has an entry in wikidata (or vice versa) I'll link the two. I'm not sure if that answer's your questions.Bogger (talk) 13:20, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- The only thing unclear to me is the Wikidata aspect. Can you explain please, in case I need to get something changed there to align with Wikipedia's aims? Widefox; talk 10:07, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
July events from Women in Red!
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK nomination of John Hamon
Hello! Your submission of John Hamon at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:19, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- List of Young Global Leaders (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Richard Walker, Sam Lee, Liu Qian and Richard Martinez
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:54, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Mathew Inns listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mathew Inns. Since you had some involvement with the Mathew Inns redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 20:18, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jane Suiter (July 6)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jane Suiter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jane Suiter, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Bogger!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 00:34, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
|
Category:People of the Year Awards winners has been nominated for discussion
Category:People of the Year Awards winners, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:01, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Category:TOYP Awardees has been nominated for discussion
Category:TOYP Awardees, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:43, 22 July 2019 (UTC)