Board who is noble

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Central Europe, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  Channel ®    21:14, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Central Europe. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Channel ®    21:22, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

This is not a matter of opinion

There are numerous unsourced claims and weasel words in the article. The tags are there for a reason. The article needs adding and sourcing before those tags can be removed.  Channel ®    21:16, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

If you think there are, go and edit there. Don't stand and wait for me to do it. Board who is noble (talk) 21:17, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Nice and constructive comments, I love that. I am restoring tags that were wrongfully removed. I'm sure there are plenty of people around with a good knowledge of Central Europe that can do a better job than I can. And judging by the Talk page, that's what they're trying to do.  Channel ®    21:20, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

I don't care about the 'plenty of people' I need sources. If you lack them I can erase your tags. Board who is noble (talk) 21:20, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

It's the other way around, actually. Lack of sources -> tags. That's why they're there. To alert people to the lack of sources.  Channel ®    21:23, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Notability of András Gregorik

The article András Gregorik has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 21:22, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

April 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Central Europe. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Apart from the your edit warring, please note that it's not allowed to delete tags at will. Provide sources for them instead. JdeJ (talk) 07:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)