A belated welcome!

edit
 
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, BlunanNation! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Dcotos (talk) 20:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply


Welcome to my talk page! Please do not bring discussions here from other pages. Please use diffs when talking about edits. If you leave me a message on my talk page, I will reply on my talk page, so you may want to watch this page. I will not continue to watch a talk page if the discussion has migrated. I check my watchlist regularly. I don't always add talk pages to my watchlist if I comment on them, unless it's a user talk page or I started an important discussion. Thank you.


May 2021

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Victoria III have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:35, 22 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Victoria 3 Logo.jpg

edit
 

The file File:Victoria 3 Logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A similar logo is already used for the article, no need for two logos

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yeeno (talk) 🍁 02:35, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Victoria 3 Logo.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Victoria 3 Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 28 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, BlunanNation. Thank you for your work on Flossie (cat). Dcotos, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi, BlunanNation Nice work!, Thank you for your contribution. Cheers!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 20:23, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you :) appreciate my work being noticed. BlunanNation (talk) 20:24, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

A kitten for you!

edit
 

Nice work! on Flossie (cat) article, Thank you.

Dcotos (talk) 20:27, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Introduction to contentious topics

edit

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:05, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply