User talk:Blethering Scot/2024/1
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Blethering Scot. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Always precious
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:54, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 January 2024
- From the editor: NINETEEN MORE YEARS! NINETEEN MORE YEARS!
- Special report: Public Domain Day 2024
- Technology report: Wikipedia: A Multigenerational Pursuit
- News and notes: In other news ... see ya in court!
- WikiProject report: WikiProjects Israel and Palestine
- Obituary: Anthony Bradbury
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2023
- Comix: Conflict resolution
The Signpost: 31 January 2024
- News and notes: Wikipedian Osama Khalid celebrated his 30th birthday in jail
- Opinion: Until it happens to you
- Disinformation report: How paid editors squeeze you dry
- Recent research: Croatian takeover was enabled by "lack of bureaucratic openness and rules constraining [admins]"
- Traffic report: DJ, gonna burn this goddamn house right down
The Signpost: 13 February 2024
- News and notes: Wikimedia Russia director declared "foreign agent" by Russian gov; EU prepares to pile on the papers
- Disinformation report: How low can the scammers go?
- Serendipity: Is this guy the same as the one who was a Nazi?
- Traffic report: Griselda, Nikki, Carl, Jannik and two types of football
- Crossword: Our crossword to bear
- Comix: Strongly
The Signpost: 2 March 2024
- News and notes: Wikimedia enters US Supreme court hearings as "the dolphin inadvertently caught in the net"
- Recent research: Images on Wikipedia "amplify gender bias"
- In the media: The Scottish Parliament gets involved, a wikirace on live TV, and the Foundation's CTO goes on record
- Obituary: Vami_IV
- Traffic report: Supervalentinefilmbowlday
- WikiCup report: High-scoring WikiCup first round comes to a close
Nomination of Liam Gray for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liam Gray until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.The Signpost: 29 March 2024
- Technology report: Millions of readers still seeing broken pages as "temporary" disabling of graph extension nears its second year
- Recent research: "Newcomer Homepage" feature mostly fails to boost new editors
- Traffic report: He rules over everything, on the land called planet Dune
- Humour: Letters from the editors
- Comix: Layout issue
New page reviewer granted
Hi Blethering Scot, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.
This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:
- Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
- If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
- If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies
You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! – Joe (talk) 11:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024
Hello Blethering Scot/2024,
Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!
2023 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.
Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.
Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive
| New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 April 2024
- In the media: Censorship and wikiwashing looming over RuWiki, edit wars over San Francisco politics, and another wikirace on live TV
- News and notes: A sigh of relief for open access as Italy makes a slight U-turn on their cultural heritage reproduction law
- WikiConference report: WikiConference North America 2023 in Toronto recap
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Newspapers (Not WP:NOTNEWS)
- Recent research: New survey of over 100,000 Wikipedia users
- Traffic report: O.J., cricket and a three body problem
The Signpost: 16 May 2024
- News and notes: Democracy in action: multiple elections
- Special report: Will the new RfA reform come to the rescue of administrators?
- Arbitration report: Ruined temples for posterity to ponder over – arbitration from '22 to '24
- Comix: Generations
- Traffic report: Crawl out through the fallout, baby
Orphaned non-free image File:Rocky Broadway (Cast Cd).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rocky Broadway (Cast Cd).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 8 June 2024
- Technology report: New Page Patrol receives a much-needed software upgrade
- Deletion report: The lore of Kalloor
- In the media: National cable networks get in on the action arguing about what the first sentence of a Wikipedia article ought to say
- News from the WMF: Progress on the plan — how the Wikimedia Foundation advanced on its Annual Plan goals during the first half of fiscal year 2023-2024
- Recent research: ChatGPT did not kill Wikipedia, but might have reduced its growth
- Featured content: We didn't start the wiki
- Essay: No queerphobia
- Special report: RetractionBot is back to life!
- Traffic report: Chimps, Eurovision, and the return of the Baby Reindeer
- Comix: The Wikipediholic Family
- Concept: Palimpsestuous
Nomination of Gareth Armstrong (footballer) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gareth Armstrong (footballer), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gareth Armstrong (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 July 2024
- News and notes: WMF board elections and fundraising updates
- Special report: Wikimedia Movement Charter ratification vote underway, new Council may surpass power of Board
- In focus: How the Russian Wikipedia keeps it clean despite having just a couple dozen administrators
- Discussion report: Wikipedians are hung up on the meaning of Madonna
- In the media: War and information in war and politics
- Sister projects: On editing Wikisource
- Opinion: Etika: a Pop Culture Champion
- Gallery: Spokane Willy's photos
- Humour: A joke
- Recent research: Is Wikipedia Politically Biased? Perhaps
- Traffic report: Talking about you and me, and the games people play
Nomination of Connor Rennie for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Connor Rennie, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connor Rennie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 July 2024
- Discussion report: Internet users flock to Wikipedia to debate its image policy over Trump raised-fist photo
- News and notes: Wikimedia community votes to ratify Movement Charter; Wikimedia Foundation opposes ratification
- Obituary: JamesR
- Crossword: Vaguely bird-shaped crossword
Orphaned non-free image File:Pride and Prejudice* (*sort of).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pride and Prejudice* (*sort of).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
New language page
@Blethering Scot I just created another language dialect page for the Bujeba dialect of Equatorial Guinea. Could you possibly give it a review? Or have it reviewed for me? Or have it connected to a Wikidata? Thanks. Fdom5997 (talk Fdom5997 (talk) 19:42, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
Hey! You reviewed the incorrect page.
The correct page I created is Touch (Katseye song). This0k (talk) 07:15, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- No I reviewed the Redirect not the article. Blethering Scot 10:27, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 August 2024
- In the media: Portland pol profile paid for from public purse
- In focus: Twitter marks the spot
- News and notes: Another Wikimania has concluded.
- Special report: Nano or just nothing: Will nano go nuclear?
- Opinion: HouseBlaster's RfA debriefing
- Traffic report: Ball games, movies, elections, but nothing really weird
- Humour: I'm proud to be a template
Request for clarification
Hello,
Please I’m a bit confused and thought to reach out to you for clarification. A page I created Orondaam Otto was marked as revised by you on 16/08/2024. However, I noticed that it is still in the list of unpatrolled pages. Was it only the redirected that was revised or the page as a whole? I look forward to hearing from you soon. Cheers! Mevoelo (talk) 16:09, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Page Curation
Hello. Seems like your tool Page Curation adds an extra line at the top [1][2]. Christian75 (talk) 07:26, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
Page curation (2)
Dear, it would seem that you spend quite some effort at "page curation". While I appreciate and respect your effort, I am afraid I find it little relevant. Whether my actions are "curated" or not, I will stand by them, anyway. So: yes, do keep up the good work! But there might be better fields to apply your drive and energy and motivation ;) Sincere thanks, and my kindest regards! Jan olieslagers (talk) 23:07, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
3r siege of Tobruk
I think this is a typo and should be '3rd siege'... Regards Keith-264 (talk) 15:15, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- I assume you are talking about the redirect to the article Axis capture of Tobruk. Whilst the redirect contains a typo, whereby that may be helpful i.e. a likely typo we would not delete it. That's why I was happy to review it as ok. There is already a link of 3rd Siege of Tobruk in place. Blethering Scot 15:53, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
redirects
Do you only review/patrol redirects? I still have a number of outstanding other redirects and new pages that need to be patrolled, some dating back to April. I would appreciate if you would review/patrol them when you get some time. Iljhgtn (talk) 16:51, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive
| New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Speed of reviewing
Hey Blethering Scot. First of all, thank you for your efforts at reviewing at NPR. I am however concerned about your speed of reviewing, especially now that I see Wikipedia:Database reports/Top new article reviewers stating that you completed 2,023 reviews over the past 24 hours and you've apparently reviewed more than User:DannyS712 bot III over the last 30 days. 2,000 reviews in a day is not a reasonable rate and it's a rate that suggests proper caution and care may not have been given. So, could you slow it down and try to be a bit more thorough? Also, if you're reviewing that many redirects you should consider nominating users to have their redirects auto reviewed at WT:RAL. It's one of our best methods to help keep the backlog down and focus reviewer attention where it should be. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:53, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, first of all if you look deeper I very much review the easy ones, and have left any that require more thought, or deeper investigation. There is a huge amount that are creating a backlog for a backlog sake. Re RAL I was actually typing to find out yesterday if it was portable to nominate people, rather than apply themselves, but couldn’t find it. Whilst I do understand your concern about speed, and I’ll take that on board, but I’m not concerned about missing any. During September I was planning on looking at the more difficult ones. Blethering Scot 13:02, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Even if you believe you're being careful and thorough, I don't think 2k in a day is a reasonable, and I think others would agree. Either way, as you said, you've heard my concern. Anyways, WT:RAL is the place to nominate others for redirect autopatrol. I did so I believe for 100+ people before I became an admin and started managing the list directly instead. The general criteria is 100+ problem free redirects. If they have redirects deleted at RfD they're less likely to be eligible, unless it was a one off or there's been a lot of good work creating redirects since then. I call CSD G6 (technical deletions), G7 (self request), and G8 (target was deleted) no-fault deletions, where we don't hold it against the person being nominated. R3 deletions (implausible typos or misnomers) are something we will consider as a point against their judgement when considering whether to have their redirects autopatrolled. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:08, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, and a good way to check how many redirects they've created is this link at XTools. Make sure to select the "only include redirects option"! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Even if you believe you're being careful and thorough, I don't think 2k in a day is a reasonable, and I think others would agree. Either way, as you said, you've heard my concern. Anyways, WT:RAL is the place to nominate others for redirect autopatrol. I did so I believe for 100+ people before I became an admin and started managing the list directly instead. The general criteria is 100+ problem free redirects. If they have redirects deleted at RfD they're less likely to be eligible, unless it was a one off or there's been a lot of good work creating redirects since then. I call CSD G6 (technical deletions), G7 (self request), and G8 (target was deleted) no-fault deletions, where we don't hold it against the person being nominated. R3 deletions (implausible typos or misnomers) are something we will consider as a point against their judgement when considering whether to have their redirects autopatrolled. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:08, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Redirect autopatrol list
- Hi both of you. I know it may be against protocol to specifically ask to be nominated, but both of you have reviewed/patrolled my own redirects at least dozens of times each in the past. Maybe one of you could nominate me for this? I did not know it was even available until @Hey man im josh just mentioned it above. If this is out of place, please let me know and ignore my request. Iljhgtn (talk) 21:26, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- You can self-request at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect autopatrol list#Requests if you want :) –Novem Linguae (talk) 21:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- You actually are already on the list @Iljhgtn, the bot is just down at the moment it seems. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:26, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Would I get a notification from the bot if it reviews a redirect? I have never seen one before if so. Iljhgtn (talk) 15:14, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Iljhgtn: You will unless you turn notifications for reviews off in your preferences. I only added you yesterday or the day before I believe. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:16, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- I see. What is the name of this bot so I recognize it? Iljhgtn (talk) 15:17, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- User:DannyS712 bot III. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:19, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- That one only recognizes very select redirects I believe and not all of them created by someone on the list, correct? Iljhgtn (talk) 15:21, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- It does very select types of redirects for everyone, but it also does all of them created by someone on the list. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:22, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- I understand now. Thank you for clarifying. Iljhgtn (talk) 15:25, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- It does very select types of redirects for everyone, but it also does all of them created by someone on the list. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:22, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- That one only recognizes very select redirects I believe and not all of them created by someone on the list, correct? Iljhgtn (talk) 15:21, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- User:DannyS712 bot III. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:19, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- I see. What is the name of this bot so I recognize it? Iljhgtn (talk) 15:17, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Iljhgtn: You will unless you turn notifications for reviews off in your preferences. I only added you yesterday or the day before I believe. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:16, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Would I get a notification from the bot if it reviews a redirect? I have never seen one before if so. Iljhgtn (talk) 15:14, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hi both of you. I know it may be against protocol to specifically ask to be nominated, but both of you have reviewed/patrolled my own redirects at least dozens of times each in the past. Maybe one of you could nominate me for this? I did not know it was even available until @Hey man im josh just mentioned it above. If this is out of place, please let me know and ignore my request. Iljhgtn (talk) 21:26, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Note
Fine... i will update sevens football page, but if any sock returns, let you know. Cenderabird (talk) 20:31, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- If you are concerned about sock puppets please report them through the normal channels, which it sounds like you are aware of. You do not need to notify me. I have no interest in this, only that you seek consensus should you wish the article to be deleted or redirected, as sockpuppets and whether it should be an article are totally different things.Blethering Scot 20:46, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 September 2024
- News and notes: WikiCup enters final round, MCDC wraps up activities, 17-year-old hoax article unmasked
- In the media: AI is not playing games anymore. Is Wikipedia ready?
- News from the WMF: Meet the 12 candidates running in the WMF Board of Trustees election
- Wikimania: A month after Wikimania 2024
- Serendipity: What it's like to be Wikimedian of the Year
- Traffic report: After the gold rush
Draft Article related to Draft:IMU-CET
@Blethering Scot I have been trying to publish an article on IMU-CET an entrance exam conducted in India for merchant navy can you view and help me publish it. I don't mean to promote/advertise the examination. For reference you may see JEE-Main,JEE-Advanced,CLAT. I want similar for IMU-CET as well. If you think if there is any error in the draft please let me know. LOHITRAM (talk) 13:39, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
New language page
@Blethering Scot I had created another language dialect page for the Bujeba dialect of Equatorial Guinea about a month ago. Could you possibly give it a review? Or have it reviewed for me? Or have it connected to a Wikidata? Please let me know. Thanks. Fdom5997 (talk) 04:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
NPP Backlog drive
Hey Blethering Scot. I was just wondering, is there any reason you haven't signed up for the NPP backlog drive? You're already reviewing and I think it's always nice to sign up to receive barnstars for what you're already doing :P Plus, it might push someone else into doing a little more if they wanted to finish top 5 or top 10! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Blethering Scot, I just wanted to again encourage you to add your user talk page (User talk:Blethering Scot as the entry) to the backlog sign up sheet at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/September 2024/Participants. That's all that you'd have to do to sign up! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:39, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
NPP Acticity for WP:DRWHO
I saw that you have been adding tags and doing some merges in articles related to WP:DRWHO, so I wanted to say thanks; we (the members of the mentioned WikiProject) were actually going to source the summaries from elsewhere, because merging this many articles felt like too many. Lots of Thanks, again. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 20:27, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- No problem. Where its possible, and not overly time consuming I like to check and do what I can.Blethering Scot 19:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Reviewing my redirects
Thanks for reviewing my redirects that I create over at WP:AFCRD. I was wondering if, as a patroller myself (who hasn't really used the permission much), I should mark/review my own redirects to make things easier? Cheers, and thanks again :-). LR.127 (talk) 18:17, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Also pinging @YoungForever: as a thank-you for reviewing the redirects I create :-). I don't think I can officially thank you for reviewing, and I don't want to create two similar topics, so here it is. LR.127 (talk) 18:20, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- @LR.127:
You're welcome! Also, DannyS712 bot III is a bot that reviews specifically redirects. — YoungForever(talk) 19:11, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- @LR.127:
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Merging without attribution
Hi, Blethering Scot. You recently merged content from Domain of the Voord into Doctor Who: The Early Adventures, but did not provide the required attribution. In the future, when performing merges, please follow the instructions at Wikipedia:MERGETEXT or WP:CWW. You must provide an edit summary linking to the original article whenever you move content from Wikipedia from one page to another. In this case, instead of repairing the attribution, I went ahead and removed the plot summary you moved. If you read it closely, you'll notice that it looked like a blatant advertisement. It was. It was copied from the official plot summary. These are copyrighted, and may not be reproduced on Wikipedia without evidence that they have fallen into the public domain. Thank you for your time. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 07:48, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- GreenLipstickLesbian. Is there anything you can run the text through to check if largely copyrighted. I am averse to not trying to merge where possible, but get what you are saying. If there isnt then I will leave someone else to pick these up at NPP.Blethering Scot 07:18, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- @GreenLipstickLesbian:. Blethering Scot 07:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- I tend to use a tool called WP:EARWIG to check articles for copyright violations. There's two checkmarks that are particularly relevant: "Use search engine" and "Use links in page". Most of the time, you can just select "Use links in page" and it will compare the article text to the text of the sources, and highlight anything obvious. If the draft/article isn't well cited, you can use either the "Use search engine" button or manually search some sentances and see what comes up. With plot summaries, however, if I notice they're promotionally toned I normally look at the official plot description on streaming services, official trailers, store-front listings, or for older media, I go to Ebay and look for through people's pictures of the back of the box. (I typically only do that if I'm really suspicious, however). I hope some of this is useful. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 07:24, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
FFXIV Redirect
Thanks for reviewing my redirect. I added the redirect for 2013 game Final Fantasy XIV to differentiate it from the 2010 version of FFXIV which shut down in 2012 and got replaced by the 2013 version. Counterdoom (talk) 13:31, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 September 2024
- In the media: Courts order Wikipedia to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"
- Community view: Indian courts order Wikipedia to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus
- Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics
- Opinion: asilvering's RfA debriefing
- News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?
- Recent research: Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Wikipedia editors
- Traffic report: Jump in the line, rock your body in time
September 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award
|
Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar | |
| This award is given in recognition to Blethering Scot for accumulating at least 200 points during the September 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 19,000+ articles and 35,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 26,884.6 points) completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:19, 7 October 2024 (UTC) |
September 2024 NPP backlog drive – Streak award
|
Asymmetric Epicyclic Gears Award | |
| This award is given in recognition to Blethering Scot for accumulating at least 50 points during each week of the September 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 19,000+ articles and 35,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 26,884.6 points) during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 19 October 2024
- News and notes: One election's end, another election's beginning
- Recent research: "As many as 5%" of new English Wikipedia articles "contain significant AI-generated content", says paper
- In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
- Contest: A WikiCup for the Global South
- Traffic report: A scream breaks the still of the night
- Book review: The Editors
- Humour: The Newspaper Editors
- Crossword: Spilled Coffee Mug
Ernst David (printer) redirect
Hello! I don't think I understand what you did with this, because I have no experience with redirects. However, in my opinion all the links between Ernst David (printer) and Ernst David (musical instrument maker) should be removed. Long ago, someone else wrote an article about the instrument maker, but erroneously put it under the title of the printer. Ernst David (printer) should in my opinion be a red link until there's an article about him. They aren't the same person, and as far as I know they're not even related. TooManyFingers (talk) 19:32, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:A Gentleman's Guide to Love and Murder.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:A Gentleman's Guide to Love and Murder.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Saban Field
Hello! Thanks for your input there. I chose related topic because it pertains to the field at Bryant-Denny Stadium. Former name I think does not work well because it is the current name of the field at the stadium. Welcome to ideas. Red Director (talk) 20:40, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- To be honest I am know not sure. The article lead states Saban Field at Bryant-Denny Stadium, rather than just Bryant Denny Stadium. Which to me doesn't make it related, it effectively is the same name as redirect. To be honest at first glance I assumed it was a sponsored name. I think related topic from your description is probably correct, but lead isnt clear IMO. Blethering Scot 20:46, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Your "review"
Seriously, you thought this was ok??? Johnbod (talk) 01:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 November 2024
- From the editors: Editing Wikipedia should not be a crime
- In the media: An old scrimmage, politics and purported libel
- Special report: Wikipedia editors face litigation, censorship
- Traffic report: Twisted tricks or tempting treats?
A couple redirects you reviewed
Hey Bletering Scot, thanks for your work reviewing. I just wanted to note that I've nominated a few of the redirects you've reviewed for deletion, such as 2032 United States House of Representatives elections and 2030 United States House of Representatives elections. The reason I did, with these and some of the other nominations that I made, is because there's no relevant information at the target about these events. As such, the redirects are misleading and WP:TOOSOON. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:56, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- @User:Hey man im josh. Awww ok. For some reason I find that difficult to get in my head.Blethering Scot 14:59, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- No problem, I did that myself for a while too, until I got more familiar with the norms at WP:RFD. They're reasonable reviews at first thought, because they WILL point to there *eventually*, they're just a bit too soon. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:00, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- @User:Hey man im josh. I have seen a few like Next Irish general election recently. Thoughts? I can see there usefulness in the short term, but it will be an ever changing redirect, which makes me think they are pretty useless.Blethering Scot 19:09, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Blech, those ones are such a pain to deal with. Essentially, what happens, is that they're useful for a while and typically not deleted at RfD until several months after an election (because people follow links), and with no new/better target being available. So, essentially, these redirects need to be a updated on a rolling basis. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- @User:Hey man im josh. I have seen a few like Next Irish general election recently. Thoughts? I can see there usefulness in the short term, but it will be an ever changing redirect, which makes me think they are pretty useless.Blethering Scot 19:09, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- No problem, I did that myself for a while too, until I got more familiar with the norms at WP:RFD. They're reasonable reviews at first thought, because they WILL point to there *eventually*, they're just a bit too soon. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:00, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
The Ryukyuan redirects
Most of these dialect names were taken from Nakamoto Masachie's 図説琉球語辞典 (i think that was the title), and from UniCog. If no detailed doc of any dialect exists, feel free to delete them. :) Chuterix (talk) 21:18, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
HK1 suggestion
I don't understand what you want done here. I have changed HK1 (a gene name) to hexokinase I (the enzyme name normally used in enzyme papers). I plan to do the corresponding edits to the hexokinase II and hexokinase III (articles still entitled Hk2 and Hk3). Hexokinase IV is a special case and will need more reflection. Athel cb (talk) 14:33, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- The redirect was new page triaged. That is all, and it has no bairing on the work you have done. Any new page, whether it’s a redirect creation, page move or a new article will be
Reviewed. Blethering Scot 15:37, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Little Miss Marker (film) redirect
Actually, the {{R from incomplete disambiguation}} template at Little Miss Marker (film) was correct, and I have restored it. The target Little Miss Marker is a disambiguation page listing Little Miss Marker (1934 film) and Little Miss Marker (1980 film), which means that "(film)" alone is an incomplete disambiguation. GTrang (talk) 15:25, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- @ GTrang. Thanks for letting me know. Blethering Scot 15:34, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Hi there,
I noticed that you'd moved this page. Is this the standard title format for such pages?
It sounds a bit back to front to me- with the city coming before the area- in a way that City Centre, Dundee or "Dundee city centre" don't (e.g. like Glasgow city centre).
See also Category:Central business districts in the United Kingdom (there doesn't appear to be a category specific to Scottish cities).
Laerol (talk) 23:47, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi again,
- I notice this has now been moved to Dundee city centre. Unfortunately, there are now a number of links that have become broken because of multiple redirects (e.g. Cowgate, Dundee).
- I've tidied some of them up but don't have the time to fix them all (see [3], though the "what links here" cache may be out of date and includes links in footer templates, apparently).
- All the best, Laerol (talk) 00:28, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
"r from misspelling"
Hi. I am concerned that you added an {{r from misspelling}} tag at Driver development program, when instead, the page move that created the redirect should have been reverted per MOS:RETAIN, as someone changed national varieties of English without consensus and when the page covers NASCAR as well as Formula 1. It was clearly not a misspelling, so I have replaced it with a more appropriate tag in the interim while I wait for the move to be reverted at WP:RM/TR. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 00:50, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Katherine "Katie" Breann Cooper redirect
This redirect was voted to be kept because other editors determined there was nothing wrong with it, but after the deletion request is closed, you immediately put it up for speedy deletion. What made you do that? Shoot for the Stars (talk) 17:04, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- It came back up on the list for review, and I didn’t realise was same one. Which is very strange. Secondly as far as I’m concerned that redirect is beyond stupid. No one searches like that. It’s a case of two redirects would have been better than one. I will be keeping an eye on the traffic to these. Blethering Scot 17:10, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 November 2024
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Snake Pit British Championships 2024
Can you explain what the tag/suggestion means? Spagooder (talk) 21:50, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- When a redirect or article is created it goes into the New Page Patrol Process. I reviewed it and marked as patrolled. As the redirect was to a specific section of the article, the section tag was added. No changes are required to it.Blethering Scot 21:58, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
See how {{rcatsh}} and {{Redirect category shell}} now you know for next time. Anthony2106 (talk) 05:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)