Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Dancer and the Clown, The, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://thedancerandtheclownbook.com/. As a copyright violation, Dancer and the Clown, The appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Dancer and the Clown, The has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Dancer and the Clown, The. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Dancer and the Clown, The, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia.

--porges 06:05, 27 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Re

edit

As it says above, the page was deleted by Chairboy because it was a copyright violation. --W.marsh 20:02, 3 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Xenophon

edit

Clearly I should re-read the Memorabilia - but that's not my statement, merely a rephrasing of what was already there. Septentrionalis 20:30, 8 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

It makes no sense, but you will get more respect if you create your userpage, even to say Hello, world!.

The Dancer and the Clown

edit

There is indeed a deleted article by this name. You can see the deletion log here. Judging by the page content, it was deleted because it was a book published by a vanity press, by an apparently unknown author. For a book or author to have an encyclopedia article, there would need to be significant coverage by reliable sources. Wikipedia is a place for encyclopedia articles, not book reviews. Friday (talk) 08:14, 26 December 2006 (UTC)Reply