Beckyrose233
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Beckyrose233 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I Honestly Do not understand why i was blocked from editing this is clearly unfair for what reason sorry ? Beckyrose233 (talk) 23:23, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
It's in the block notice above and the message you got: We believe you have been using undisclosed multiple accounts in violation of our policy. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:34, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Comment @Daniel Case Am in anyway not affiliated those those account you mentioned Daniel this is clearly unfair after years of dedicated time here on Wikipedia i just will be suspended without proper investigation.i would advice you look into this again am clearly aware of Wikipedia policy using undisclosed multiple accounts in violation of our policy and strongly condemn it but tagging me because of some random edit i made it clearly not fair (talk)
Thomas Elms moved to draftspace
editAn article you recently created, Thomas Elms, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 00:51, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
UNBLOCK REQUEST
edit Beckyrose233 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please have been mistakenly blocked I went through your suppose tools and found the slight coincidence am not in any way affiliated to those accounts in mention please would advice you look into this very well probably make use of the ip or something Beckyrose233 (talk) 06:37, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
My use of the checkuser tool confirms that you have abused multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 10:01, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your submission at Articles for creation: MohBad has been accepted
edit
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Carpimaps talk to me! 12:34, 18 June 2023 (UTC)Concern regarding Draft:Thomas Elms
edit
Hello, Beckyrose233. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Thomas Elms, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Thomas Elms
edit
Hello, Beckyrose233. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Thomas Elms".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:47, 17 September 2023 (UTC)