Bbriggs1
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Mile high club. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --Nlu (talk) 03:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Your rollback request
editHi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for rollback/Denied/May 2008#bbriggs1. RFRBot (talk) 01:00, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Cleanup tagging
editPlease note that reference tagging at the top of an article page is utilized to reduce the overuse of smaller tags in the article. This is particularly true in an article such as this that makes so many statements of fact that need tagging. You're new to Wiki so you should take some time out to review WP:CLEANUP. The particular tag that I used was not stating that the article lacks and sources, but that the article needs more sources. This tag is used rather than cluttering the article with several "cn" tags. Further, if you are looking for guidelines on how to apply a particular tag, they are usually provided on the template page. For instance, for the guidelines on this tag go to Template:Refimprove. Hope this helps you a bit. --Ave Caesar (talk) 19:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Rollback
editI'm afraid I've declined your roll back request. You seem to have very little evidence of vandal fighting since your last request. Try doing some recent change patrolling for a while, and try again when you've got better experience with dealing with vandals. Don't be disheartened - you've made some good edits improving articles. Keep up the good work! — Tivedshambo (t/c) 19:05, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Faculty Comment
editHi, Bbriggs1: you recently made a comment about me saying that I was a faculty member on my talk page. I looked all over my talk page and found nothing of the sort. You might have me confused with another member of the greater wikipedia community. If you still think that this comment was on my talk page, it might be best if you cut it and paste it in quotations and sight your source so I can track it. Just for your record, I am not a member of the Harvard University Faculty.
Thanks, --128.103.142.23 (talk) 03:07, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:28, 20 September 2010 (UTC)