BarrieMichelle

Hi there, Barrie! Stroud109 (talk) 16:38, 25 September 2012 (UTC)stroud109

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! BarrieMichelle, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!

I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 04:24, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi BarrieMichelle! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by: Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen Join the conversation on our Twitter feed Reading and writing for our blog channel We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate! Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 04:24, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Wiki Peer Review-Junya

Hey Barrie,

I would love to say the wiki page of Diffusion of Innovations is pretty robust. I will suggest you add more internal links to the page, if possible; and you might want to add more content to the Electronic communication social networks section, such as more introduction to the book and giving an example of the argument made by the author. What's more, as a reader, I would like to see not only the failed example of the theory, but also successful ones.

Junya — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yvonne1212 (talk • contribs) 04:25, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Barrie, I have to say that diffusion of innovation theory is one of my favorite theories and that's why I choose to comment on your page.I really love the diagrams used which make the theory much clearer.And it is so good to see there are lots of examples. It can help reader better understand the theory. A suggestion could be to adjust the sturcture of the content. It is a little disordered now. For example, the adoption rate, five characters of innovation and opinion leaders, all of them can be catogirzed to the "elements" part. In this way, the content could be more instructive and readers may better understand the relationship within them. I think you're still in the midst of working on it so please don't let me distract you. Qianqian Qianqianxgz (talk) 05:33, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Wiki Peer Review DR

I have to agree with the previous comments. This article is quite developed towards the top of the article get more sparse towards the bottom. The Electronic Communication Social Media can definitely be enhanced. Perhaps also talk about the assumptions of the theory like Turner and West do. Also, in the Adopters Categories table...maybe it would be useful to cut some of that text and instead create a simple list for each category. Overall, I think your page needs edits to be more succinct and needs more information regarding new media and other examples of the theory in action.

Minor edit: Go through and standardize the article section titles for capitalization (Some of Them Read Like This, While Others read like this).Wikisyzygy (talk) 12:47, 13 November 2012 (UTC)