Bardusquus
Welcome!
editHi Bardusquus! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Ahmetlii (talk) 08:02, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Camponotus ligniperda moved to draftspace
editHowdy - this is a fine article, but unfortunately the sourcing is completely insufficient. We can't provide Antwiki as a source because it is user-generated, i.e. not a reliable source by WP standards. The Antwiki article itself lists a great number of sources. What would be required here is the attribution of material in this article to individually named references among those. I realize that may be a great deal of work, since Antwiki apparently does not require in-line referencing for individual statements, but we kinda do. Cheers --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:25, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I'm sorry for that. At the minimum how many valid sources are required for each individual statement, or even the entire article? I'm willing to put in the work to reference as much as I can. Bardusquus (talk) 17:58, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- A good approach is to work downwards from the section level: if the entire section can be referenced to one source, fine, otherwise go down to paragraphs, then to sentences. More than one source for any unit that is so covered isn't really necessary, unless you've got it around anyway. Having more sources is certainly appreciated by the reader though! - At the article level, the minimum number of sources is usually taken to be two; we've got plenty of stubs that only have one source, but they all get tagged for improvement. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:43, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
I've changed and added a couple more sources now. I see the article was drafted, so if possible will it be reinstated (perhaps as a stub) and if so, when? Bardusquus (talk) 20:47, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
editArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHello, Bardusquus. Thank you for your work on Constrictotermes cavifrons. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)